Another vaccine-promoting pandemic scare, however this one is a Globalist / China bioweapon (if it does exist at all – it was computer generated from a segment said to be from the virus, then re-imagined) to crash the world economy and grab recently lost power back, enforce a police state, and enforce a sinister vaccine via medical tyranny unlike we’ve ever seen before. It was originally gameplanned in a 2010 Rockerfeller foundation ‘Lock Step scenario’ for a worldwide pandemic, simulated in Event 201, and then carried out weeks later after being leaked from a Wuhan, China bioweapons lab. Lockstep forecasted a pandemic for “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership” with a “deadly effect on economies“, where China’s mandatory lockdowns would become the blueprint for other countries, where “national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets“, “in developed countries… biometric ID’s for all countries“, scanners in “airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent”, “and mimicking [of] China’s firewalls [for] policing Internet traffic (to) fracture the “World Wide” Web.” Sound familiar?
We were told initially that the premise for lockdown was to ‘flatten the curve’ and therefore protect the hospitals from being overwhelmed. It is clear that at no point was there any danger of them being overwhelmed, and since May 2020 covid wards have been largely empty; and crucially the death toll from covid has remained extremely low. While death tolls and cases were constantly displayed in the media for maximum fear-mongering, the truth was hidden from the public that the majority of people who died had significant comorbidities, such as Alzheimer’s, cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes and the vast majority occurred in elderly and very elderly people. In addition, hospitals were incentivized to claim ‘Covid’ as the cause of death even if they died from another comorbidity. Senator Dr. Scott Jensen explained on The Ingraham Angle:
Right now Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much. Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things impact on what we do.
In the UK, the rules for the signing of death certificates were changed solely for covid by the Coronavirus 2020 Act. Following the unprecedented act, Doctors did not even need to have physically seen the patient in order to sign death certificates and removed the need for a confirmatory medical certificate for cremations. Autopsies have virtually been banned, no doubt leading to misdiagnosis of the true cause of deaths; and also reducing our understanding of the disease itself. Worse still, care home staff who largely have no medical training are able to give a statement as to the cause of death. Covid was put on death certificates merely on the ‘suspicion’ of people having covid. This may well be unlawful, since it is a crime to falsify death certificates but almost all are from something besides covid. People who die within 28 days of a positive PCR test are deemed to have died from covid, even if they die in a car crash, were poisoned (over 7,900 accident and poisoning deaths listed as Coronavirus deaths), or from a heart attack (CDC: over 26,500 heart attacks listed as Coronavirus deaths); clearly over inflating the death toll.
We now have hundreds of thousands of so-called ‘cases’, ‘infections’ and ‘positive tests’ but hardly any sick people. Recall that four fifths (80%) of ‘infections’ are asymptomatic. Covid wards have been by and large empty throughout June, July, August and September 2020. Most importantly covid deaths were almost non-existent by mid-July 2020. It is clear that these ‘cases’ are in fact not ‘cases’ but rather they are normal healthy people. So-called asymptomatic cases have never in the history of respiratory disease been the driver for spread of infection. Rather it is symptomatic people who spread respiratory infections – not asymptomatic people.
Corrupt bureaucrats at the World Health Organization (WHO), such as Tedros Adhanom, the U.S.’s NIH (Anthony Fauci), the CDC’s Robert Redfield and others pushed the Operation Lock Step measures while the controlled media has given them a platform and echoed the narratives, claiming we would all now have to ’embrace’ a “new normal“.
It also became abundantly clear that the ‘pandemic’ had been basically over since June 2020, having reached herd immunity and therefore having no need for a vaccine. There are proven safe and very effective treatments and preventative treatments for covid that are being suppressed by the medical establishment, demonized by the controlled mainstream media, and censored by social media platforms and search engines such as Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and Google. Lockdown measures, social distancing, mask wearing, testing of healthy individuals, track and trace, immunity passports, and the vaccination program are unscientific, unnecessary, and only used for control and fearmongering, thus should be ended immediately. This catalogue of unscientific, non-sensical policies enacted, infringe our inalienable rights, such as – freedom of movement, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. These draconian totalitarian measures must never be repeated.1
In the video above, Vladimir Kvachkov, a former colonel of Russian military intelligence, calls COVID-19 a false pandemic, planned and implemented with the goal of gaining totalitarian control over the world population. It started with 9/11, Kvachkov says, and the coronavirus is the next step to continue the power grab.
“It’s all a lie and needs to be considered as a global, strategic special operation,” Kvachkov says. “These are command and staff exercises of the world’s behind-the-scenes powers on controlling humanity.”
Comparing it to a military exercise, Kvachkov says the ultimate aim is to reduce the world’s population to 1 billion “ordinary” people and just 100 million of those in control — with the ordinary people being there to serve the 100 million. In short, he says, the “artificially created” and “purposely spread” coronavirus has four dimensions. The first is religion and population reduction; the second is to establish political control over humanity; the third is to deflate the world economy; and the fourth is to eliminate geo-economic competition.
Top pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson told government officials in Alberta that the current coronavirus crisis is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.” Noting that he was also an expert in virology, Hodkinson pointed out that his role as CEO of a biotech company that manufactures COVID tests means, “I might know a little bit about all this. There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians, it’s outrageous, this is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public,” said Hodkinson.
In his report “Pandemic Games” (in French – to translate click Settings>Subtitles>Autotranslate>then choose language), Paul Schreyer has described very lucidly this entanglement of corporate “elites” and political “elites,” which has become ever deeper over the last 20 years. There he also illustrates how these elites have been attempting, in a targeted and practised manner, not only to retain illegitimate power but even to extend such power indefinitely with the aid of the most massive and cynical control mechanisms before the objects of these control mechanisms – which is us – can notice and rebel against it.1
In his lecture “Why do the lambs not speak up,” Professor Rainer Mausfeld explained in turn (incidentally, already at the beginning of 2019 and so entirely independently of the Corona story) how over many years politics has repeatedly manufactured fear and panic, without the general public realising what was happening, in order to get people to support political decisions which they would otherwise reject.1
The former US deputy minister of housing construction and investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts explains in her documentary film “Catherine Austin Fitts Full Interview Planet Lockdown” how these “elites” are currently implementing the takeover of the assets of the middle classes or are trying to (because if only 10% of the population notice this, the house of cards will collapse, some thinkers assume an even lower percentage). With the focus here on the USA, but certainly applicable to elsewhere, one of the ways in which this is happening is that, first of all, areas with small and medium-sized businesses, for example restaurants and retailers, are closed via Lockdown so that their owners can no longer make a living, and in particular that they can no longer pay back any loans they have taken out. Although aid packages are announced, these are disbursed only sparingly if at all. Thereafter – and this may apply specifically only to the USA – riots are organised in these areas, which lead to the additional destruction of these businesses so that they can no longer be sold even in a fire sale. Thereafter, investors with tax breaks and from the aforementioned Davos clique can acquire these businesses for next to nothing.
Christine Massey and her team have made about 40 FOI requests to public health agencies in various countries, requesting proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, yielding in total zero records describing the essential step of isolation aka purification. The virus has yet to be isolated and purified, thus no one has gone through the usual scientific process of identifying COVID-19 as a specific virus. A CDC journal article from June 2020 exhibits this fraud as researchers claim they decided which was the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ and in addition virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. That means it is not even contageous.
These facts are being concealed from the public by the scientific and medical establishments. So the PCR test would be looking for…what? A virus that isn’t there? PCR tests cannot be verified for accuracy as there is no ‘gold standard’ against which to check them. PCR tests, though its inventor says PCR was never meant to be a test, cannot detect viral loads and are prone to false positives. A positive PCR test does not mean that an individual is infected nor infective.
In fact approximately 90% of the PCR positive ‘cases’ are false positives. We therefore have no second wave and no pandemic. The government’s report estimates a false positive rate of between 0.8 to 4.0 % using data from other viral infections – not from covid. Viral fragments, which is what the PCR ‘test’ looks for in a magnification process, may remain in people’s bodies for several weeks following recovery from infection.
Celia Farber conducted a two-hour interview with David Crowe– Canadian researcher, with a degree in biology and mathematics, who explained how they use the PCR manufacturing process as a test: “What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative. ...it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.”
It’s like fingerprints. With PCR you’re only looking at a small number of nucleotide. You’re looking at a tiny segment of gene, like a fingerprint. When you have regular human fingerprints, they have to have points of confirmation. There are parts that are common to almost all fingerprints, and it’s those generic parts in a Corona virus that the PCR test picks up. They can have partial loops but if you only took a few little samples of fingerprints you are going to come up with a lot of segments of RNA that we are not sure have anything to do with corona virus. They will still show up in PCR. You can get down to the levels where its biologically irrelevant and then amplify it a trillion-fold.
The crisis will never end if we are waiting for zero positive tests. Everyone has probably had a cold caused by a coronavirus and will likely have a few viral fragments matching those of the cousin SARS-CoV-2 virus. Testing healthy asymptomatic individuals is non-sensical, unscientific and a colossal waste of money. The governments moon shot daily testing program will cost £100 Billion roughly two thirds of the annual NHS budget. Antibody testing is not the gold standard as many people have T-cell immunity, and antibodies may not circulate following recovery from infection.
And when deaths are too low to cause panic, what do you do? Modify the definition of a ‘case’ from sick to just a positive test result, increase the amount of testing (see chart below), and create the illusion with the controlled media that the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ is as bad as ever. BS!
In spite of testing at an all-time high, deaths are lower than ever – in ALL age groups:
The basis for lockdown was a mathematical model (not even peer reviewed) by the fear-mongering Professor Neil Ferguson predicted half a million deaths in the UK and 2 million deaths in the US – clearly wrong by a factor of 10 or 12 times (times another 21x when you factor that 96% of all deaths were not actually from covid) – after also being vastly wrong about sars, mers, mad cow’s disease (CJD), and swine flu. More accurate predictions from eminent epidemiologists such as Professor Gupta from Oxford University were ignored. Countries which did not lock down Sweden, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Belarus have all done significantly better than us in terms of percentage of population deaths. They also have herd immunity and intact economies.
Lockdown did not save lives, and this has been published in the Lancet – ‘….in our analysis, full lockdowns and wide-spread COVID-19 testing were not associated with reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality.’
- Covid poses virtually zero risk to the under 45’s who have more chance of being struck by lightning than dying from covid.
- Covid poses a very small risk for healthy under 60 year olds who have a greater chance of accidental drowning than dying from covid.
The entire nation was essentially placed under house arrest. We have never quarantined the healthy before. Isolating the sick and those who are immunocompromised makes sense. Isolating the healthy has hampered the establishment of herd immunity and makes no sense.
Placing the public under virtual house arrest has caused untold damage to both physical and mental health. Ventilating patients instead of oxygenating patients proved to be a deadly policy and an unwarranted failure. Ventilation resulted in many unnecessary deaths. Sending infected people from hospitals to care homes placed the elderly and frail under unnecessary risk and resulted in many unnecessary deaths. Blanket Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were imposed on thousands of people without their consent nor the consent of their families – this is both unlawful and immoral and lead to unnecessary deaths in care homes. Hospitals became essentially ‘covid only’ centres vast numbers of patients were wilfully neglected, resulting in many thousands of unnecessary deaths. The UK government’s own report estimates that some two hundred thousand (200,000) people will die as a direct result of lockdown – not the virus. Hospitals being closed, suicide and poverty will result in more deaths than the virus.
A study, published in the November issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Communications, of 10 million people in Wuhan, China – ground zero for the COVID virus, also provided clear evidence that asymptomatic spread of COVID does not occur, nullifying all reasoning for business closures, social distancing, face masks, and lockdowns. The study was compiled by 19 scientists from the Huazhong University of Science & Technology in Wuhan, and highly respected scientific institutions in the UK and Australia.
“A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19,” the study concluded. Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for a period of no less than two weeks and the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period,” the study found.
This, in addition to the CDC journal article from June 2020, where virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. Further examination of the study subjects revealed that “virus cultures” in the positive and re-positive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.” COVID-19 is definitively proven not contageous and asymptomatic spread of COVID does not occur.
“Deadly Effect on Economies”
As predicted by the Rockerfeller Foundation 2010 report in the Lockstep scenario, Covid has had a “deadly effect on economies” as, in their own words in 2010, “international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” The Rockerfeller Foundation has been a trojan horse for the new world order conspirators for over 100 years, having gradually seized control in a clandestine operation to monopolize industries, including the health industry by creating big pharma. Now, toward the final stages, they seek to create a culture of fear with a global pandemic for” tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership” by their world government United Nations WHO mandates.
It is well known that poverty directly adversely affects health, we can expect to see many people suffering with poor health and resulting in many premature deaths, as a direct result of lockdown. Isolation must be voluntary. People are perfectly capable of making their own assessment of the risks and must be free to go about their lives as they so choose. People must have the right to choose whether to isolate or not. Likewise, businesses must have the right to remain open if they so choose.1
- Reports estimate that as many as six and a half million (6,500,000) people in the UK will lose their jobs as a result of lockdown.
- The USA lost 20.6 million jobs from mid-March through April, resulting in an unemployment rate of 14.7%, a level not seen since the Great Depression in the 1930s.
- In Canada, more than 7.2 million people applied for emergency unemployment assistance by April
- In India, 91.2 million jobs were lost in April, but 14.4 million came back in May, 44.5 million in June and 25.5 million in July.
- More than 10 million workers in France’s private sector are being supported by the state, through a scheme called chômage partiel (partial employment or short-time working). “That’s more than one employee out of two, and six companies out of 10,” French Labour Minister Muriel Penicaud Penicaud told the country’s BFM Business radio.
- Germany’s unemployment rate has risen far less rapidly than countries such as the US. In part, this is because of a government scheme to subsidise the wages of struggling employers and employees called the Kurzarbeit, or short-time work programme. By late April, it was helping more than 10 million people, however, unemployment is still up, rising in April by 373,000, bringing the proportion of jobless to 5.8%.
- In March, the unemployment rate in Italy dropped to 8.4% – its lowest level for almost nine years.
In a few short months, we’ve been dramatically shifted from a state of freedom to a state of totalitarianism, and the way that was done was through social engineering, which of course involves psychological manipulation. Censoring and propaganda are but two strategies that shape and mold a population. Psychiatry professor Albert Biderman’s “chart of coercion” also includes the following methods, all of which can be clearly related to the COVID-19 response:
- Isolation techniques — Quarantines, social distancing, isolation from loved ones and solitary confinement
- Monopolization of perception — Monopolizing the 24/7 news cycle, censoring dissenting views and creating barren environments by closing bars, gyms and restaurants
- Degradation techniques — Berating, shaming people (or even physically attacking) those who refuse to wear masks or social distance, or generally choose freedom over fear
- Induced debility — Being forced to stay at home and not be able to exercise or socialize
- Threats — Threatening with the removal of your children, prolonged quarantine, closing of your business, fines for noncompliance with mask and social distancing rules, forced vaccination and so on
- Demonstrating omnipotence/omniscience — Shutting down the whole world, claiming scientific and medical authority
- Enforcing trivial demands — Examples include family members being forced to stand 6 feet apart at the bank even though they arrived together in the same car, having to wear a mask when you walk into a restaurant, even though you can remove it as soon as you sit down, or having to wear a mask when walking alone on the beach
- Occasional indulgence — Reopening some stores and restaurants but only at a certain capacity, for example. Part of the coercion plan is that indulgences are always taken away again, though, and they’re already saying we may have to shut down the world again this fall
Increasingly media, special interests, and politics are preventing doctors from helping patients. Doctors and scientists with views that differ from the government narrative have had their videos and articles removed from the internet. During the Covid-19 pandemic, through legal threats, public ridicule, and internet suppression, doctors have been prevented from using and publicizing various treatments.3
- In China, the doctors that first sounded the alarm on Coronavirus were “disappeared” – physically.
- In America, the doctors that make unbiased observations are being “disappeared” – virtually. Their medical observations, knowledge and opinions simply erased from the internet via Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, and others.
- Previously respected medical publications have disseminated false studies.
- Doctors who study for years, with decades of experience making highly informed judgment calls, have had their professional experience suddenly usurped by state government officials and media hacks.
- Tech giants have shut down the rational observations of doctors working on the frontlines who have saved their patients’ lives time and again.
Why? Powerful special interests are now preventing the effective practice of medicine that saves lives at a time when we need this unbiased, evidence-based information more than ever. To fight this destruction of doctor-led practical medicine, America’s Frontline Doctors was formed by Dr. Simone Gold and other doctors to empower the voices of individual doctors on the frontline. They provide a forum to combat the large and powerful special interests that would seek to push financial and political agendas above patient interests.
The World Doctors Alliance, an independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world, have also united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity. This alliance of doctors filed a class action lawsuit on October 10th, 2020 to end the tyrannical and unncessary mandates for lockdowns, social distancing, mask wearing, testing of healthy individuals, track and trace, immunity passports, and the vaccination program.
These alliances, in addition to many other doctors, believe that the American people have the right to be informed through the release of frontline practical knowledge, not carefully corporate-curated data that is beholden to special interest censorship. They fight for Americans right to use accurate information to make decisions about their own care, to fight this disease…and to live.
The controversial drug Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been unfairly smeared, by the WHO, CDC, NIH and the media. However HCQ has very firm support from, amongst others: Professor Harvey Risch epidemiologist from Yale, The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), American Frontline Doctors, the Henry Ford Health System and Professor Didier Raoult microbiologist and infectious disease specialist – to name but a few. The Lancet was even forced to retract a study on HCQ after it was revealed by the Guardian newspaper that they had been completely fabricated and written by a sci-fi writer and a porn star. Even following this astounding revelation HCQ was still banned in most countries.
HCQ according to AAPS has a ninety per cent (90%) cure rate when given early and alongside zinc. HCQ is safer than many over the counter drugs such as aspirin, Benadryl and Tylenol. The AAPS also point out that there has never been a vaccine as safe as HCQ. HCQ has been licensed for over sixty years and has been safely used by billions of people worldwide. There is a very small risk of arrythmia which is easily monitored. Why was HCQ banned then? Could it be that there are no huge profits (on average less than $10 [range 37-63 cents per tablet]), to be made from this out-of-patent drug? HCQ was used to great effect in the Sars1 outbreak of 2005. In short had HCQ been available then there would not have been a pandemic !
Preventative measures such as hydroxychloroquine or vitamins D, C and zinc should have been recommended for the public, but were instead suppressed. Early calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) treatment to hospitalized COVID-19 patients significantly reduced intensive care unit admissions. Vit D reduces the severity of covid. Voluntary isolation of the frail – should they so choose; in combination with preventative measures would have been a far better strategy. The rest of society could and should have continued as normal.
The Trampling of Privacy and Human Rights
The technocracy’s fingerprints are also evident in the invasive, privacy-shredding tracking and tracing programs that have been rolled out around the world, and the repeated warning that unless every man, woman and child gets vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, life will never go back to normal. The truth is, the technocrats have no intention of ever letting us go back to normal. The plan is to alter society permanently. Part of that alteration is the removal of civil liberties and human rights, and it is now happening at breakneck speed.
As reported by Alex Berenson in a September 30, 2020, Twitter post, real-world experience suggests mobile phone carriers, including AT&T and Verizon, are already providing data to state governments for quarantines and contact tracing purposes without your knowledge or consent, even though we’ve been told track and trace apps would be voluntary.
We’re also being bombarded with news reports telling us to prepare to roll up our sleeves and get vaccinated as soon as a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available — or else. An October 1, 2020, article in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine bemoans a poll that found only 49% of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 vaccine when it comes out. The answer, the article suggests, is to make it mandatory for all. Written by lawyers at Stanford Law School and other health policy experts, the article outlines what the authors claim are “six substantive criteria” that would support the first vaccine ever to be mandated for adults, outside of the flu vaccine for health care workers.
Recognizing that it’s the individual states, not the federal government, that would do the mandating, the authors also review measures that states would need to implement in order to pull off a mandate. “State mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty,” the authors say, adding that this penalty should be “substantive,” in the form of employment suspension or stay-at-home orders. If refusing a vaccine results in you being denied an income and forced into house arrest, then it’s not really voluntary, is it? It’s as compulsory as it gets.
Along with Gates, Dr. Anthony Fauci has also been priming the public consciousness throughout the pandemic by warning that, without a vaccine, we’ll never be able to go back to normal. All this talk is about forced vaccination, despite the complete lack of assurance that any of the vaccine candidates are safe.
Emerging evidence actually suggests the novel mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 could be a public health disaster in the making. An October 1, 2020, report by CNBC reviews the experiences of five participants in Moderna’s and Pfizer’s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. One of the participants in Pfizer’s vaccine trial “woke up with chills, shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose,” CNBC reports. During trials, adverse effects were experienced with four volunteers developing Bell’s Palsy. Six people died during trials testing Pfizer’s new Covid vaccine, the US FDA announced on December 9th, but the FDA insisted the deaths posed no threat to the safety or effectiveness of the vaccine. There was a 10-Fold increase of serious adverse events on second dose in older adults on second dose, compared to 3.6-fold for those under 55.
Professor Eric Caumes, head of the infectious and tropical disease department at a major Paris hospital, measured his words, saying, “As I read the 53 pages, something struck me. I have never seen such a high frequency of adverse events for a vaccine. Apart from minor injection reactions such as local redness and pain, other side effects occur at relatively high rates, especially in young people and after the second dose.
A Moderna trial participant said he had a low-grade fever and felt “under the weather” for several days after his first shot. Eight hours after his second shot he was “bed-bound with a fever of over 101, shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. He said the pain in his arm, where he received the shot, felt like a ‘goose egg on my shoulder.’ He hardly slept that night, recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.”
Two others reported similar side effects, and a third warned you would need to take a day off after the second shot. CNBC also noted that “as companies progressed through clinical trials, several vaccine makers abandoned their highest doses following reports of more severe reactions.”
Conflicts of Interest
Billionaire Bill Gates has a lot of pull in the medical world. He has a multi-million dollar relationship with Dr. Fauci, and Fauci originally took the Gates line supporting vaccines and casting doubt on Chloroquine. Coronavirus response team member Dr. Deborah Birx, appointed by former president Obama to serve as United States Global AIDS Coordinator, also sits on the board of a group that has received billions from Gates’ foundation. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently provided funding to both IHME and Imperial College London, which put out wildly overblown models for the Coronavirus outbreak that caused mass panic and contributed to worldwide government lockdown. Gates is a big proponent for a population lockdown scenario for the Coronavirus outbreak.2
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID, a division of National Institutes of Health, NIH) director since 1984, Dr. Anthony Fauci, (whose deadly errors are anything but comical) actually funded a study on Bat Coronavirus, which was mainly conducted at UNC in Chapel Hill before being shut down and moved to Wuhan China where Fauci secured an additional $3.7 million. Fauci is very tight with Bill Gates as well as a supporter of Hillary Clinton. Gates Admitted That He Stopped President Trump’s Planned Vaccine Safety Commission With Robert Kennedy Jr. in the Early Days of the Trump Administration. Fauci holds numerous patents that present more potential conflicts of interest for him in the medical field, as many of these patents directly pertain to HIV treatment.2
Dr. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. says that Fauci is also guilty of abusing his post for financial gain in the form of obtaining lucrative vaccine patents. Doctors and researchers underneath him who developed breakthrough technologies were fired so that Fauci could assume ownership of their work in order to enrich himself. “Tony Fauci has many, many vaccine patents,” Kennedy contends, noting that Fauci now owns a patent on a special protein sheet made from HIV that helps to more efficiently deliver vaccine material throughout the body. Fauci didn’t develop this protein sheet himself, of course, but rather stole it from someone else who was relieved from duty after creating it.
“Tony Fauci fired [this person] and he somehow ended up owning that patent,” Kennedy says. “And that patent is now being used by some of these companies … to make vaccines for the coronavirus … that company has a 50/50 split with Tony Fauci’s agency … so Fauci’s agency will collect half the royalties on that vaccine and there’s no limit for how much the agency can collect.”
Kennedy says: “The problem is Anthony Fauci put $500 million of our dollars into that vaccine. He owns half the patent. He and these five guys who are working for him were entitled to collect royalties from that. …This isn’t a captured industry; it’s a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry,” Kennedy further warns about how the NIAID, the CDC, and other supposed federal agencies are really just corporations in disguise that work on behalf of Big Pharma to generate massive profits on the backs of sick and dying people. Fauci has other conflicts as well.
In the UK, Chief Scientific Officer Sir Patrick Vallance has £600,000 worth of shares in GSK Glaxo Smith Klein. He has in recent years sold £5 million of shares in GSK which he ‘earned’ whilst chief of GSK. Sir Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer UK, accepted over £30 million in funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation to study malaria vaccines.
It has become clear that members of the SAGE, Public Health England (PHE), World Health Organisation (WHO), Centre for Disease Control (CDC), National institute for Health (NIH) etc have many conflicts of interests. They all accept very large ‘donations’ from the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry. These conflicts of interests may well have effectively corrupted their integrity. It is also clear that governments are heavily lobbied by the pharmaceutical industry and the vaccine industry, again this may have compromised their integrity.
Vaccine manufacturers will make trillions from this, as will track and trace manufacturers, and the pharmaceutical industry stand to make trillions from covid testing. Of course, so do those with patents on the vaccines and manufacturing processes, including those such as Fauci, Gates, and others. Those in power, perhaps mostly those who were losing power, benefitted from the extreme, unscientific measures of the lockdowns by securing greater dictatorial power.
China’s super wealthy earned a record US$1.5 trillion in 2020, more than the past five years combined, as e-commerce and gaming boomed during pandemic lockdowns, an annual rich list said on Tuesday (Oct 20). Jack Ma, founder of e-commerce titan Alibaba, saw his wealth surge a whopping 45 per cent to US$58.8 billion as online shopping firms saw a surge in business owing to people being shut indoors for months during strict lockdowns to contain the virus.
(USA) From March to June 2020, while 40 million Americans filed for unemployment during the pandemic, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos saw his wealth rise by an estimated $48 billion. The founder of the video-conferencing platform Zoom grew his nest egg by over $2.5 billion, and former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer’s net worth increased by $15.7 billion. Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson saw his wealth increase by $5 billion, while Elon Musk saw an increase of $17.2 billion. When you add up the numbers, billionaires in the United States have increased their total net worth $637 billion during the COVID-19 pandemic so far. (Aug 3)
The same is true in Ireland.
At the end of July, the total assets of the world’s more than 2,000 billionaires had risen to a record level of around 10.2 trillion dollars, according to a study by consulting firm PwC and the major Swiss bank UBS.
Continued on next page…