We are now seeing the return of last century’s eugenicist movement through the popular promotion of sterilization as a method of birth control. A popular women’s magazine in the UK recently featured an article entitled, Young, Single and Sterilized, in which women in their 20’s discussed why they had undergone an operation to prevent them from ever having children. The article is little more than PR for a “women’s charity” called Marie Stopes International, an organization that carries out abortions and sterilizations and was founded by a Nazi eugenicist who advocated compulsory sterilization of non-whites and “those of bad character”. In addition, exposure to pesticides, industrial chemicals, processed food, food additives, sugar, trans fats, genetically modified food, vaccines, medications, radiation, tobacco, excessive alcohol, recreational drugs, cleaning products, synthetic fragrances, and other toxins are all having a negative effect upon the ability to conceive and produce healthy babies.
In the article mentioned above, sterilization is lauded as an “excellent method of birth control” by Dr. Patricia Lohr of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. The article includes an advertisement that encourages women to seek “more information about sterilization” by contacting Marie Stopes International. We read that, “Over the past year, a quarter of the women who booked a sterilisation consultation with women’s charity Marie Stopes were aged 30 or under.”
Marie Stopes was a feminist who opened the first birth control clinic in Britain in 1921 as well as being Nazi sympathizer and a eugenicist who advocated that non-whites and the poor be sterilized. Stopes, a racist and an anti-Semite, campaigned for selective breeding to achieve racial purity, a passion she shared with Adolf Hitler in adoring letters and poems that she sent the leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes also attended the Nazi congress on population science in Berlin in 1935, while calling for the “compulsory sterilization of the diseased, drunkards, or simply those of bad character.” Stopes acted on her appalling theories by concentrating her abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce the birth rate of the lower classes. Stopes left most of her estate to the Eugenics Society, an organization that shared her passion for racial purity and still exists today under the new name The Galton Institute. The society has included members such as Charles Galton Darwin (grandson of the evolutionist), Julian Huxley and Margaret Sanger.
Forced Sterilization… in the USA!
Tens of thousands of men, women and young girls, mostly blacks and Indians, were forcefully sterilized in 31 states from 1929 to 1978. The overwhelming majority of people who are victims of sterilization abuse in the U.S. are Native American, Black, Chicano, and Puerto Rican women. California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first 25 years of eugenics legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as “bad girls,” diagnosed as “passionate,” “oversexed” or “sexually wayward.” At the Sonoma State Home, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Even the U.S. Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind . . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman.  Eugenics and the Nazis — the California connection by Edwin Black
In North Carolina, the sterilization program targeted women, young girls, and blacks. Elaine Riddick was 13 years old when she got pregnant after being raped by a neighbor in Winfall, N.C., in 1967. The state ordered that immediately after giving birth, she should be sterilized. Doctors cut and tied off her fallopian tubes without her knowledge or permission. “I have to carry these scars with me. I have to live with this for the rest of my life,” she said. Riddick was never told what was happening. “Got to the hospital and they put me in a room and that’s all I remember, that’s all I remember,” she said. “When I woke up, I woke up with bandages on my stomach.” Riddick’s records reveal that a five-person state eugenics board in Raleigh had approved a recommendation that she be sterilized. The records label Riddick as “feebleminded” and “promiscuous.” They said her schoolwork was poor and that she “does not get along well with others.” “I was raped by a perpetrator [who was never charged] and then I was raped by the state of North Carolina. They took something from me both times,” she said. “The state of North Carolina, they took something so dearly from me, something that was God given.”
In 1975 alone, some 25,000 Native American women were permanently sterilized–many after being coerced, misinformed, or threatened. One former IHS nurse reported the use of tubal ligation on “uncooperative” or “alcoholic” women into the 1990s.” (Broken Treaties, Empty Promises: An Introduction to Native American Women’s Reproductive Health Issues by Jay Heavner) In 1967 the American Public Health Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists conducted a study and found that 54 percent of the teaching hospitals nation-wide “…made sterilization a requirement for winning approval for an abortion” (Weisbord, 1975: 155). A Look at the Indian Health Service Policy of Sterilization, 1972-1976 by Charles R. England
Between 1963 and 1965 more than 40, 000 Colombian women were sterilized in a program funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. These women were coaxed by gifts of lipstick or artificial pearls, by small payments of money, and by promises of free medical care. A million women were sterilized in Brazil between 1965-1971. In India, men were given transistor radios if they agreed to a vasectomy. In Bolivia, a U.S.-imposed population control program administered by the Peace Corps sterilized Quechua Indian women without their knowledge or consent.
The Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, among others have poured millions into private agencies and research organizations in an effort to “curb population growth” around the world. Dr. Louis Hellman, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs in the PHS, presented statistics confirming that 150,000 low income people were sterilized in the U.S. from federal grants (Akwesasne Notes, 1977: 22) A Look at the Indian Health Service Policy of Sterilization, 1972-1976 by Charles R. England
The U.S. funded population control in foreign countries through the Agency for International Development. USAID (a deep state front organization for achieving their depopulation agenda while purporting to be saving the world from poverty) spent more money on population control the last year of the legal eugenics program – $125 million in 1973 – than it spent on programs like agricultural and rural development.
A study done by Puerto Rican demographer Dr. Jose Vasquez Calzada in 1968 demonstrated that 35.3% of Puerto Rican women of childbearing age have been sterilized. Puerto Rico has been a colony of the United States since it was invaded in 1898 and the US has absolute control over all aspects of Puerto Rican life, including the economy where it serves as a haven for U.S. corporations seeking cheap labor, natural resources, and 100% tax free profits. For the U.S., controlling the population of Puerto Rico was/is an attempt to divide the Puerto Rican nation and limit political unrest so that superprofits for U.S. corporations will not be threatened.
Vaccine as Sterilants
Innocent women and girls in developing countries have been deliberately experimented on, with the use of infertility vaccines, for many years. A total of 56 (now showing 61) research papers listed on PubMed are related to contraceptive vaccines dating as far back as 1977. No doubt a researcher entering a range of different search terms could come up with many more. One paper in particular, published in 1989, written by G.P. Talwar and R. Raghupathy titled Anti-Fertility Vaccines appears to suggest that they are. The authors stated:
“Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.
A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future.” (source)
Not long after this paper was published, vaccines were administered to women and children in a number of countries, including Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines, causing many of them to become infertile.
In 1997, another paper by G.P. Talwar titled Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Hormone Dependent Cancers was published by Immunology and Cell Biology. The author stated in the introduction:
“The twentieth century is marked by an unprecedented rise in the population. Four billion people will be added to the world population in 73 years of this century, whereas the global population attained the two billion mark only in 1927. In India, the population increases by 18 million per year, equivalent to the entire population of Australia.
Although a number of methods are available for contraception, they are not suited to many people in economically developing countries and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the contraceptive needs of 350 million couples are unmet.” (Source)
At first glance, it appears that the scientists were trying to develop a vaccine to use as an alternative method of contraception, to be offered at fertility clinics; that is, until you read deeper into the paper. On page 185 in the section titled Operational Strategy, the author stated:
“Both hCG and LHRH are self hormones in humans and are poor antigens. To improve their immunogenicity, they are derivatized with haptenic groups as followed by Stevens ct al. in their initial studies or they are chemically linked to carriers to enlist T helper cell activity. We used carriers, first tetanus toxoid (TT) and later diphtheria toxoid (DT) or cholera toxin chain B (CTB). Tetanus accounts a large mortality of women at the time of delivery, which in developing countries, often occurs in places other than maternity homes/clinics. TT conjugates conferred immunoprophylactic benefit against tetanus, besides overcoming immunological tolerance to the self hormone. Diversification of carriers on repeat immunization avoided hyperimmunization against a given carrier and carrier-induced immunosuppression.”
Reading on, the section titled Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, reads as follows:
“Human chorionic gonadotropin was a preferred choice as a target for a contraceptive vaccine of three groups of investigators. Although the existence of’ leaky genes making small amounts of hCG in the non-pregnant state has been observed by William Odell. the hormone thus made is not conspicuous in its bioactivity nor appreciable in amount, hCG is a definite marker of pregnancy, when trophoblastic and other tumours are excluded. Its synthesis and secretion begins at the pre-implantation stage, as observed in the vitro-fertilized human embryo. It is involved in implantation since marmoset (south or central American monkey) embryos exposed to anti-phCG antibodies do not implant.’”
The author continued by adding:
“Interception of conception by anti-hCG antibodies is also supported by phase II clinical trials where no lengthening of the luteal phase was observed in women who were protected from becoming pregnant. As pregnancy is deemed to begin only after implantation of the embryo to the endometrium. hCG vaccine by preventing it is not an abortifacient but a contraceptive vaccine. hCG is also required for corpus luteum support and production of progesterone during the first 7 weeks until the placenta takes over. It thus has a role in both establishing and supporting pregnancy. Its chemistry was known by the early 1970s and it could be purified from pregnancy urine.”
These vaccines appear to be strikingly similar to the vaccines that were given to the women in developing countries aged between 15 and 45 by WHO for tetanus in 1994, just three years earlier, which were also found to contain the hormone hCG. It was discovered by The Comite that some of the vials contained human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy. So, were the women and children living in developing countries in 1994 deliberately experimented on? It certainly appears that they were, as the vaccine trials using the tetanus vaccine on women and girls of childbearing age took place three years before this paper was written. Another point that should be mentioned here is the fact that these trials were unethical, and yet there is no mention of an ethics committee. Were members of an ethics committee ever consulted before any of these vaccines were administered? (source)
Again in 2014, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing. The vaccines were pushed by a UNICEF campaign and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for HCG antigen used in anti-fertility vaccines. In addition, the tetanus vaccines (normally given indiscriminately to male or female) were targeted only to young girls and women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4th of 2014:
“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.” (Source.)
Bill Gates, whose father was the director of the abortion-happy organization Planned Parenthood, and his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have spent millions in sterilization science and technology – from anti-fertility spike vaccines to unknowing millions of women and teens in Africa, to abortion, to the latest in chip technology. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been working in conjunction with a small Massachusetts startup to develop the “digital pill” that will enable women’s fertility to be switched on or off, remotely, with the touch of a button. Following testing, the microchips are due to be rolled out globally in 2018 with “every woman in America” replacing their regular contraceptive pill with the new remote-controlled chips, according to Gates.
“If we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.” —Bill Gates
“Cervical cancer accounts for less than 1 percent of all cancer deaths — so it was somewhat surprising when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration fast-tracked approval of Gardasil, a Merck vaccine targeting the human papilloma virus that causes the disease.
As of the end of January 2010, 49 unexplained deaths following Gardasil injections have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. By contrast, 52 deaths are attributed to unintended acceleration in Toyotas, which triggered a $2 billion recall.”
There has been no recall for Gardasil, however. In fact, as Hollingsworth points out, it is required for sixth-grade girls in D.C., Maryland, Virginia, and many other states. (source)
Fluarix, the vaccine manufactured by GSK against the swine flu, was also reported to cause infertility. Documentation received from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) states that the mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations increased Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems (VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250 percent in pregnant women in 2009-10. Eileen Dannerman from NCOW stated that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) deliberately misled the nation’s obstetricians and gynecologists and colluded with the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mislead the public by advertising the flu vaccine as a safe vaccine for pregnant women when they knew fully well that it was causing a massive spike in fetal deaths.
Flu vaccine containing Mercury (the vaccine ingredient that started the Vaccine autism epidemic) is recommended for pregnancy (which is interesting considering Dr Ayoub has fingered mercury as part of the depopulation agenda), yet MMR is contraindicated. See: Vaccine mercury poisoning. “I think it’s really important for women to understand that this is a possible link, and it is a possible link that needs to be studied and needs to be looked at over more [flu] seasons,” said Amanda Cohn, senior adviser for vaccines at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which funded the study.
In 2010, India’s government suspended the Gardasil vaccination study that was supposed to test the vaccine in about 32,000 girls. The program was halted because four girls died after receiving the vaccine, and more than 120 others reportedly suffered stomach disorders, epilepsy, headaches, early menarche and other adverse events. [2015 Oct] Is Your Unborn Baby Part of a Vaccine Experiment? by Christina England [Christina England] “…despite recommending these vaccinations to all pregnant women, the CDC readily admits in their own documentation that neither vaccine has ever been tested during pregnancy for vaccine safety and that they have no idea whether the vaccines could harm a growing fetus.” Of course, the CDC also claimed to have no data that the MMR was linked to autism, but CDC whistleblower informant, Dr. William Thompson and Merck whistleblowers who exposed fraud in testing the MMR vaccine.
“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care. [Nov 2007] Sleight of Handling: More Merck Magic Tricks With HPV Vaccine By Christopher C. Barr
It appears that many of the recommended vaccinations are known by the governments and pharmaceutical industries to cause infertility. Many of these vaccines are mandatory. We need to ask ourselves why our governments are deliberately force-vaccinating us with vaccines known to cause infertility. Another question we need to ask is why are so many studies being funded to study the subject area surrounding vaccines and infertility.
In addition, multiple studies have shown that GM foods cause sterility, yet the government agencies not only allow it to continue to be sold in the USA, but conceal these facts from the public. First, there’s a 2008 Australian study linking GMO’s to infertility, a 2015 Egyptian study, a Suez Canal University study, and a long-term feeding study commissioned by the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety. A study presented at the Days of Defense Against Environmental Hazards in Russia unveiled that scientists from the National Association for Gene Security and the Institute of Ecological and Evolutional Problems discovered that animals fed GMOs as part of their normal diet eventually develop the inability to reproduce.
The studies show that mice who eat GMO corn for extended periods of time have fewer babies, and the babies they have are considerably smaller than the mice who eat non-GMO corn. Over 50% of the babies born to mother mice fed GMO soy died within three weeks. The third generation of mice in the line who had been fed GMOs were completely infertile, and testicle cells in the male mice showed alarming and significant changes when fed GMOs. Sheep, buffalo and goats in India died after eating genetically modified cotton plants. Jerry Rosman, a pig farmer in Iowa, was cultivating GMO corn, (Roundup Ready and BT) and fed this corn to his pigs. As a result his sows became infertile, and then after one year he went bankrupt. (Watch Video)
In addition, sterility can be caused by cell phones, laptops/WiFi, artificial sweeteners, BPA in plastics, and taking ordinary drugs as simple as aspirin can cause infertility.
Is 5G a Sterilization and Eugenics Program?
Chronological History of Sterility, Causes and Agenda
Canadian Supreme Court Rules Children To Be Taken From Their Parents & Sterilized Under Trans Agenda