December 8, 2020
(updated December 22, 2020)
Published by LeeF
A renowned whistleblower of Big Pharma and vaccines has been found dead roughly a year after she released a public statement saying she’d never commit suicide.
The body of Brandy Vaughan, former pharmaceutical insider and ex-Merck sales executive, was discovered by her nine-year-old son earlier this week, according to reports.
The cause of death is currently unknown.
“I’ve NEVER had any thoughts of taking my own life, not once, ever. Even before I had my son,” said Vaughan in a Facebook statement from last December. “I have a huge mission in this life. Even when they make it very difficult and scary, I would NEVER take my own life. Period.”
“I have NEVER been on an anti-depressant nor been diagnosed as depressed – don’t believe it if you ever hear anything like this.”
Additionally, healthnutnews.com is reporting Vaughan made it clear that if anything happened to her it would most likely be homicide.
Please take a moment to watch and share Vaughan’s appearances on Infowars.com back in 2015:
Also in 2015, Vaughan had created LearnTheRisk.org to educate people on the dangers of pharmaceutical products, vaccines and unnecessary medical treatments.
Moreover, watch this resurfaced video of Vaughan describing the intimidation attacks she endured during her activist work:
Vaughan’s Facebook statement from December 2019 can be found below:
Brandy Vaughan (age 47) passed away today. Brandy Vaughan was founder of https://t.co/3rP31S2Ge0 , a vocal critic of BIG Pharma, educating people about dangers of vaccines and pharma drugs.
“Today’s top-down, authority-based ‘standard of care’ for early COVID, promulgated in NIH guidelines, is therapeutic nihilism,” she said in her prepared statement.
“This is shocking and unprecedented, but in today’s litigious environment,” she said, doctors who “dare prescribe” a drug proven to effectively treat COVID-19 like hydroxychloroquine could be “fired, removed from insurance panels, investigated, or even delicensed.”
Other witnesses were Ramin Oskoui, the CEO of Foxhall Cardiology in Washington, D.C.; Jean-Jacques Rajter, a pulmonologist at Broward Health Medical Center in Florida; Pierre Kory, associate professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center; Armand Balboni, CEO of Appili Therapeutics Inc.; and Jayanta Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at Stanford University.
Orient said patients nationwide are calling her organization, the AAPS, in search of a doctor who will treat them.
“One patient told me he had had his wife drive him all the way to Dallas when all the doctors he knew in Tucson refused to prescribe hydroxychloroquine,” she said.
“His severe symptoms were relieved within hours.”
She said doctors report that they can’t get hydroxychloroquine for their nursing home patients. Orient insisted that randomized controlled trials don’t support the quarantines, masks and lockdowns.
“They have not stopped the pandemic and are unsustainable,” she said.
She said vaccines are touted as “a great hope” but have not been shown to prevent contagion.
“What is needed now is effective early treatment for COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine and other safe, long-used agents could be immediately available if government stopped blocking access and deterring use.”
See the hearing:
In the first hearing, in November, as WND reported, the panel’s chairman, Johnson, noted hydroxychloroquine was used as a “weapon” in the presidential election after it was promoted by President Trump.
“The doctors who have had the courage to follow the Hippocratic oath and use their off-label prescription rights to treat patients using hydroxychloroquine have been scorned and state medical boards have threatened to withdraw their licenses,” the senator said.
Johnson said he has publicly advocated for “allowing doctors to be doctors, to practice medicine, explore different therapies and share their knowledge within the medical community and with the public.”
Inaction in front of mounting evidence
On Tuesday, Dr. Kory presented evidence that another blocked drug that is inexpensive and widely available, ivermectin, prevents infection and saves lives.
“Although we, like many, are extremely encouraged by the apparent successes in developing effective vaccines, we also are dismayed at the near complete absence of guidance and research on effective early, at-home, or preventative treatment options apart from vaccines, a reality we find unconscionable,” he said in his statement.
Kory said he and his colleagues are “worried that if our call to action is not followed through, confidence in our health care leaders and agencies will be irreparably tarnished.”
“Inaction in front of mounting evidence of safety and effectiveness during a catastrophic pandemic may also compromise widespread vaccination support,” he warned.
“We will look back to the impact that actions versus inaction had on the U.S. and the globe two months from now,” Kory said. “If we do nothing, the present trend will continue. History will judge.”
Kory and his colleagues held a press conference last week in Houston:
“In this crisis, doctors who are actually treating patients, unlike [Jha], are practicing medicine by trying different treatments to attack the virus early and give their patients hop,” Oskoui said. “They should not be ridiculed, vilified, or worse.”
He said the “establishment needs to be shaken up.”
“The normal order of business will not be enough to defeat COVID-19,” he said.
Oskoui said there’s “too much regulation, too much cronyism, too much corruption.”
“This crisis is a wake-up call. We need to set aside the old ways of doing things in Washington, innovate together and get our country back to work,” he said. “We need to investigate why the NIH, academic medicine and the CDC failed us so badly.”
Bhattacharya began by noting that early in the epidemic, the World Health Organization publicized a “very misleading 3.4% case fatality rate that panicked the world.”
The rate has turned out to be closer to one-tenth of 1%, but in any case, “for the typical person infected, the usual outcome spans the range from no symptoms whatsoever, to a mild cold, to the severe viral pneumonia that the media highlights.”
Bhattacharya cited the Great Barrington Declaration he co-sponsored, which has two planks.
“For older people, COVID-19 is a deadly disease that should be met with overwhelming resources aimed at protecting them wherever they are, whether in nursing homes, at their own home, in the workplace, or multi-generational homes,” he said. “They should be prioritized for vaccines, and we should be actively seeking widely available and effective treatments.”
But for “the non-vulnerable, who face far greater harm from the lockdowns than they do from COVID-19 infection risk, the lockdowns should be lifted and – for those who so decide – normal life resumed.”
Bhattacharya said the National Institutes of Health’s “relative lack of interest in the rapid randomized evaluation of non-patented drug evaluation represents a government failure that has likely led to worse COVID-19 outcomes than we would have had otherwise.”
December 1, 2020
(updated December 5, 2020)
Published by LeeF
European doctors are warning that a COVID-19 vaccine could make women infertile.
The doctors are demanding increased scrutiny or “regulatory action” of clinical trials of vaccine candidates designed to target COVID-19, according to a newly released petition.
The doctors specifically highlight several vaccine candidates that help the patient create antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2.
The issue is, the protein responsible for the development of a placenta in women, Syncytin-1, also takes the form of spike proteins of SARS viruses.
“There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies,” says the petition. “However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”
The petitioner and co-petitioner, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg & Dr. Michael Yeadon, respectively, both stress they are acting in “good faith” to the petition’s intended recipient, the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
“… Many EU residents/citizens will suffer irreparable harm because once the EMA approves the COVID- 19 vaccine(s) in question, both governments of EU member states and employers in the EU are most likely going to recommend them for widespread use.”
“This petition is also not frivolous and is being pursued in good faith as it seeks to increase the scientific integrity and reliability of the trials of the COVID-19 vaccines.”
November 22, 2020
(updated December 13, 2020)
Published by LeeF
The public has been demanding a vaccinated vs unvaccinated study for decades. The CDC has steadfastly refused to fund or conduct such a study. In 2019, Informed Choice WA members proudly joined the grassroots effort to fund the IPAK 2019 Vaxxed/Unvaxxed Study. The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) is a not-for-profit organization which exists to perform scientific research in the public interest. IPAK is funded by people, LIKE YOU, not pharmaceutical companies. On November 22, 2020, the study was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
This is a landmark paper as it compares whole-health outcomes of fully vaccinated vs unvaccinated children . Background: There are pediatric offices around the country that give parents the choice as to which vaccines to give their child. The CDC schedule calls for about 72 vaccines between pre-birth (up to three vaccines given to the pregnant mother) to age 18. About 60% of them contain aluminum salts which are toxicants (“poisons”) added to the vaccines to cause the body to react to the antigen. The antigen is the active part of the vaccine such as the virus or bacterium. Without the aluminum salt, if the antigen happens to be dead, the body will simply ignore it. Live vaccines such as the MMR do not require aluminum salts. We now know that aluminum salts are biopersistent and cumulative. In other words, they travel all over the body and we inject them at a faster rate than children can excrete them, via the vaccination program. If one wants to understand whether children are overall more healthy with all these immunomodulatory drugs (a fancy way of saying “a drug that modifies the immune system”) than without them, the obvious study to perform is to check the health status of 100% vaccinated kids against those kids who have received zero vaccines. Why do we want to know this? The potential damage these drugs are doing is enormous because the immune system is tightly integrated with every other system in the body, including with the nervous system—and that includes the brain. The dilemma of vaccinating children is that we want to protect them because their immune systems are not yet fully developed—yet activating the immune system of a child’s delicate developing brain is very risky. Here is how the noted medical textbook Kuby’s Immunology explains it:
“the immune system is also much more than an isolated component of the body, merely responsible for search-and-destroy missions. In fact, it interleaves with many of the other body systems, including the endocrine, nervous, and metabolic systems, with more connections undoubtedly to be discovered in time.” 
So far, the public health strategy has been to vaccinate as much as the government health agencies want, with no limit. Moreover, the CDC refuses to perform this comparative study, and four bills in Congress that would have forced them to perform this study have all failed: H. R. 2832 in 2007; H.R. 1757 (113th): Vaccine Safety Study Act 2013; H.R.1636 – Vaccine Safety Study Act (2015-16); H.R.3615 – Vaccine Safety Study Act (2017-2018). Note that the pharmaceutical industry is the second largest donor to politicians (in dollar amount) after the insurance industry and before the oil and gas industry . There is a pediatric practice in Oregon that for the last 30 years has respected the fundamental and critical need for fully informed medical consent, and also respected the individual health circumstances and needs of each of its young patients. Because of this, the practice has medical records on children ranging from those vaccinated per the CDC schedule to children not vaccinated at all. Thus, we have a population we can use to compare. What did the study find? In every measure examined, the fully vaccinated children had more problems than the completely unvaccinated children: more ear infections, more brain damage, more allergies, more dermatitis, more respiratory infections, more eczema—more everything. One category, ADHD, showed **zero** cases in the unvaccinated cohort vs the fully vaccinated cohort. As mentioned earlier, activating the immune system of the delicate developing brain is risky and aluminum salts travel around the body. We are discovering this aluminum in children’s brains. Aluminum is only slightly less toxic than mercury and possibly on par with lead. Now you may understand why millions of people are saying that the vaccination program, in creating the sickest generation this nation has ever known, is driving the sales of other pharmaceutical products to the tune of 4.5 billion prescriptions per year. It’s not our imagination: Americans really are sicker than other countries and they also are one of the most vaccinated populations on the planet. Because of the censorship of anything critical of vaccination, and the complete lack of financial incentive to improve safety of either the products or how and when they are administered, we are damaging every single child to some degree, giving them symptoms that start them on the road to being lifetime pharmaceutical customers. The authors are now moving on to Phase 2 of their study, which they describe as being focused “on the comparison of health outcomes associated with live vs. non-live vaccines, aluminum-containing vaccines vs. non-aluminum containing vaccines, as well as studying the impact of individual vaccines on specific health outcome risks.”  Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674  Kuby’s Immunology—7th Edition, p.1  Pharmaceuticals / Health Products https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php…
Overall, the more vaccines a child received, the higher the incidence of health issues, ranging from asthma to weight disorders.
The authors noted that the pediatric practice had rates of developmental disorders far lower than national rates, and they say that may be because of the individualized nature of their care.
“Developmental disorders were determined to be difficult to study due to extremely low prevalence in the practice, potentially attributable to high rates of vaccine cessation upon adverse events and family history of autoimmunity. Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 0.063% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated. The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder (0.84%) in the cohort is half that of the US national rate (1.69%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate. The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.”Lyons-Weiler, J.; Thomas, P. Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2020, 17, 8674.
DUBAI (Reuters) – Qatar has signed an agreement with drugmaker Moderna Inc <MRNA.O> to buy its potential COVID-19 vaccine as soon as it is approved and released for global use, state news agency QNA quoted a health official as saying on Sunday.
There are no internationally approved vaccines yet, but several are in advanced trials, including from Pfizer Inc <PFE.N>, Johnson & Johnson <JNJ.N> and Moderna.
“Negotiating early and securing a number of agreements enhances our chances of getting sufficient quantities of the vaccine early,” said Abdullatif al-Khal, chair of a national COVID-19 health group and head of infectious diseases at Hamad Medical Corporation.
He did not say how many doses Doha was requesting. Earlier this month, al-Khal said Qatar signed an agreement with Pfizer and BioNTech to supply Qatar with their vaccines.
Moderna said last month it was on track to produce 20 million doses of its vaccine by the end of the year, while maintaining its goal of readying 500 million to 1 billion doses in 2021.
The American group is also working with Swiss group Lonza AG to scale up the manufacturing and production of its potential COVID-19 vaccine to supply markets outside the United States.
(Reporting by Yousef Saba; Writing by Ghaida Ghantous; Editing by Andrew Heavens)