Lil Nas X Releases Nike ‘Satan Shoes’ That Contain Human Blood And Are Limited To 666 Pairs, Nike Sues

Rapper Lil Nas X unveiled a limited edition pair of “Satan shoes” that contain human blood and are limited to 666 pairs.

The “Old Town Road” singer is released the pair of shoes on March 29 as a collaboration with the custom sneaker brand MSCHF. The shoes start at $1,018 and contain “60cc ink and 1 drop of human blood.”

The timing of the shoe’s release coincides with the release of Nas’s latest video, “Montero (Call Me By Your Name),” which was released Thursday. The music video shows him dancing on a stripper pole on his way down to hell, as well as giving Satan a lap dance.

The title video “Montero” is a reference to Lil Nas X’s real name, Montero Lamar Hill, according to NBC.

Lil Nas X tweeted on March 25 that the song was dedicated to”14-year old Montero.” (RELATED: Lil Nas X Explains Why He Opened Up About Being Gay)

“I wrote a song with our name in it. it’s about a guy I met last summer. I know we promised to never come out publicly, I know we promised never to be “that” type of gay person, I know we promised to die with the secret, but this will open doors for many other queer people to simply exist,” the statement read in part.

Source: DailyCaller

The Luciferian elite who have been secretly leading the world into global slavery under their rule are boldly exhibiting their true religion:

Three days prior to the premiere of th satan shoes, Lil Nas – who is being promoted to elementary age school children – premiered a video where he simulates gay sex with Satan.

Nike later released a statement and denied their involvement with Lil Nas X. Nike said they did not collaborate on the production of the Satanic shoes by Lil Nas.

“We do not have a relationship with Little Nas X or MSCHF,” Nike said in a statement. “Nike did not design or release these shoes and we do not endorse them.”

Lil Nas later posted on Twitter what was called an “apology” but once you click on it the video shows him lap dancing on Satan. The shoes were released on the Holiest week in the Christian calendar, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Nike sued MSCHF.

Nike claims MSCHF buys the shoes from Nike, then the artists it works with make their own creative modifications before selling them at a higher price.

Nike’s suing for trademark infringement because the famous Swoosh logo is still prominently featured on X’s shoes. It wants damages, and perhaps more importantly for Nas X … Nike wants the judge to block all sales of the Satan Shoe.

The Satan Shoe sparked outrage within the sports world … with stars like Trevor Lawrence and Nick Young voicing their disgust with the product.

According to Brendan Dunne MSCHF said last week, “It is totally legal in the sense that, because we’re not doing knockoffs, because we are buying their shoes and doing our own art and selling it for more, it’s like 1000 present legal.”

Sources:

See AlsoThe Occult Meaning of Lil Nas X’s “MONTERO” and the Symbolism of His “Satan Shoes”

University Professor Loses Admin Job For Stating That “Men Cannot Get Pregnant”

Kathleen Lowrey is an associate professor of anthropology at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Alberta, in Canada. She is also serving as the chair of the undergraduate program – an administrative role which includes duties such as chairing a committee about courses, approving transfer credits, and running a special seminar for honors students in the department.

She’s also a feminist. However, according to some anonymous students and the higher-ups of her University, she is not the right kind of feminist. Because she believes that women are … women. Even worse, she believes that men cannot be women because they don’t have a vagina.

These extreme and radical views caused her to become “problematic” as she was pressured to leave her administrative role. When she refused to do so, she was fired.

Lowrey says she was told in meetings that complaints, made to the dean of students and the university’s Office of Safe Disclosure and Human Rights, were that her views on feminism were making students feel unsafe and there were concerns this was driving students away from choosing anthropology as a major. She doesn’t know exactly the nature of the complaints — or who made them — because they were made informally and anonymously, she said.

“My chair was hoping that for the good of the department I would resign from my position.”

She said she was also told she had been discouraging students from organizing Pride events, which she denies. It was this claim which led her to conclude the complaints centred around her views on gender.

Following a subsequent meeting with the dean of the faculty, she received a letter saying she couldn’t effectively continue in the role and her leaving would be in the best interests of the department. Lowrey said the letter didn’t expound upon the reasons for her dismissal, and she maintains she has never been given proper reasons for her dismissal in writing.
– National Post, University of Alberta prof loses admin role over views on gender that made students feel ‘unsafe’

Lowrey is not a conservative that is looking to “own the libs”. She actually ascribes her intellectual formation to Marxism and radical feminism. While this kind of background should receive an enthusiastic thumbs-up from the social justice crowd, it is not enough anymore.

That’s because Lowrey describes herself as a “gender-critical feminist” which considers biological sex of primordial importance in fighting for women’s rights. While, only a few years ago, this precept was the norm in feminist circles, it is now deemed bad and “transphobic”.

Until what seems like a few minutes ago, there was nothing controversial about this opinion. But now there is. The only “correct” opinion to hold is that gender expression trumps biology in any rights-based claims. And in academic circles, Lowrey’s views, which she is at no pains to hide on campus and off, are a form of apostasy that cries out for punishment.
– National Post, Barbara Kay: U of A professor holds the line on free expression

Lowrey boils her views on feminism down to a few key ideas: Men cannot get pregnant, lesbians don’t have penises, and biological sex is real. These views apparently made students feel “unsafe” and  “caused them harm”.

We are talking about a University (a place of the highest learning possible) being “harmed” by the pre-school teaching that “boys have weewees”.

Continue Reading at Vigilant Citizen…

Kmart in Australia Unveils Same-Sex Family Dolls Targeting Children as Young as 3

Kmart stores in Australia are selling a line of same-sex family dolls, complete with two children and a pet, oriented toward children as young as three-years-old.

According to Aussie news site 10Daily, the store has released “family playset” dolls for children age 3 years and older, which include two fathers, or two mothers, as well as a young child, a baby, a dog and a picnic set.

The dolls are supposedly “inclusive for same sex couples,” according to 10Daily, which does not explain why children as young as three would be concerned with the dolls’ gender.

The article goes on to quote various adult Facebook commenters who expressed approval of the dolls, under the headline “Kmart Fans Applaud Same-Sex Family Doll Sets.”

However, some “Kmart fans” quoted in the article did not “applaud” or seem excited over the dolls, with some pointing out “Kids don’t notice what [gender] the dolls are,” and another saying “no thanks.”

Another Aussie news site, 7News, laid the LGBT propaganda thick with the headline “Kmart launches same-sex family doll sets and people are absolutely loving them,” however several commenters on the 7News Facebook page pushed back against the dolls, asking if they were really necessary.

Read More…

Chick-fil-A sales have more than doubled since LGBT boycott began

The third largest US fast food restaurant chain, Chick-fil-A, has more than doubled its annual sales since the company was boycotted by gay rights activists for donating to organizations that opposed same-sex marriage in 2012. In 2018, the chain had $10.5 billion in total sales, which amounts to a 16.7% increase in a year, according to the Journal & Courier outlet. It makes the increase in Chick-fil-A’s annual sales bigger than that of Starbucks, which is America’s second largest restaurant chain behind McDonald’s. The exponential growth of Chick-fil-A’s profits and the chain’s expansion, by nearly 700 restaurants, remained unhindered despite the company facing a massive backlash in 2012 when sales totaled $4.6 billion. Back then CEO Dan T. Cathy, the son of founder and devout Baptist S. Truett Cathy, said that he supported traditional families. Earlier, the firm found itself in hot water after supporting Christian organizations, including those that opposed the legalization of…

Vimeo Yanks Christian Church’s Account for Opposing Homosexuality

The video-hosting platform Vimeo canceled the account of a church that posted videos of a Bible conference that included teaching on homosexuality. Vimeo informed Fairview Baptist Church of Edmond, Oklahoma, that the videos violated the company’s ban on posting “content that promotes Sexual Orientation Change Efforts,” reported the website Reform Charlotte. “We apologize for any […]