Medical Journal Calls For Mandatory COVID Vaccine: “Non-Compliance Should Incur A Penalty”

A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine has called for mandating a coronavirus vaccine, and outlined strategies for how Americans could be FORCED to take it.

The paper warns that an immediate mandate for the vaccine would spark too much resistance and backlash, so the writers suggest that at first it should be voluntary.

However, it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it’s availability, it should be transformed into an obligation, with penalties put into place for refusal.

The paper outlines “six trigger criteria” that need to be met before the vaccine is made mandatory, and that it should be rolled out to specific demographics of the population first.

“Only recommended groups should be considered for a vaccination mandate,” initially, according to the paper, which cites “high risk groups” as the first set of people.

“[T]he elderly, health professionals working in high-risk situations or working with high-risk patients…persons with certain underlying medical conditions,” as well as those in “high-density settings such as prisons and dormitories” should be mandated to get the jab, the paper says.

It also suggests that active-duty military service members should be among the first that are forced into the vaccination.

The paper proclaims that “noncompliance should incur a penalty” and notes that it should be a “relatively substantial” one.

It suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders,” should be issued, but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged, and “may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”

The paper also suggests that government health authorities should avoid making public their close relationship with vaccine manufacturers, to quell public mistrust.

Just coincidentally, the authors of the paper reside at Yale and Stanford, institutions that have received substantial funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for vaccine development.

The prospect of denying freedom of movement to those who refuse to vaccinate has been floated recently in the UK, where government health officials have also suggested that the jab should be made mandatory.

In the US, calls have been made to make any vaccination mandatory with the likes of the New York Times expressing concern that half of Americans would refuse to take it.

In Canada, a poll recently revealed that 60 per cent think that when a vaccine for coronavirus becomes available it should be made mandatory.

In addition, Canada’s current Chief Public Health Officer appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “tracking bracelets” for people who refuse to take a vaccine after a virus outbreak.

Source: ZeroHedge

The New Yorker Publishes an Article “Annals Of Sexology – Dr. Yes”

By the 1930s “sexual psychopath” laws were being implemented nationwide to stem what the publicviewed as escalating rates of rape, child sexual abuse and other sex crimes. Communities demanded tougher sex offender laws and an end to probation for rapists and child molesters. The sexual psychopath laws viewed sexual order as preeminent and hence saw masturbation as potentiallyundermining mature marital relations, “infantile,” “self-abuse,” and potentially compulsive and disordered. State laws, therefore, forbade all solicitation or observation of masturbation and public policycensured such conduct. In the 1920s, the Rockefeller Foundation, deeply invested in worldwide eugenicsand birth control, sought a scientist to sexually enlighten society, and in 1941 they funded Alfred C. Kinsey to carry out that charge. Kinsey, a closeted, sadomasochistic, homosexual masturbator, engaged in brutal, self-sexual torture, involving acts of pseudo-castration. His sexually revolutionary novelas, dubbed “science” books were used in courts and legislatures to eliminate sexual psychopath laws, to grant probation to violent sex criminals and to reduce penalties for sex crimes.

On the evidence, Kinsey planned a “Front Marriage” to protect his sadistic homosexual liaisons and his false scientific enterprise. Working under the authority of Indiana University, the Rockefeller Foundation and the National Research Council, Kinsey used tax and public trust funds to prostitute his wife, male staff and their wives, in pornography. Kinsey also solicited and pandered child pornography / prostitution. Exploiting his influential credentials, he crafted phony “sex science” data with which to change media, and then public opinion on all sexual issues from marriage, pregnancy, divorce, masturbation, rape, childsex abuse and incest, thus protecting dozens of his own sex crimes. To date, Kinsey appears to have died of orchitis, a disease commonly resulting from syphilis or gonorrhea. In 1998 the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University celebrates 50 years of Kinsey’s sex studies which began with Sexual Behavior in the Human Mate in 1948, triggering America’s “flower children,” making “love not war,” the current sex crime epidemic and our cataclysmic family disorder; largely a photocopy of Kinsey’s own life. A line – by-line look at a 1997 New Yorker article addressing some of Kinsey’s secret life follows.

CONTEXTING THE KINSEY NEW YORKER ARTICLE several of the cartoons surrounding the Kinsey story appear to be from Playboy or Penthouse magazine with one child pornography “cartoon” showing a little boy of about six years old in bed with a woman, both nude, smoking, he saying he won’t ever forget her as a baby sitter. While Jones ignored the real child sex abuse carried out by the Kinsey team in his article on Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey, this issue included (page 9) a photo-ad for “Lolita” with the quotation, “The only convincing love story of our century,” illustrated by a waist-down photograph of a pigeon-toed, saddle shoed adolescent. The ad told  New Yorkers  they could see the [pedophile] “love story” soon as a “major motion picture,” or they might hear the [pedophile] literature broadcast on “Random House AudioBooks,” for which “Free Reading Group Guides” are available. Ads suggesting the excitement of prostitution, lesbianism, sadism, and general perversion dot the rest of The New Yorker’s visual landscape in this special sex and/or love issue.

The above summary is an introduction to Judith Reisman’s critical analysis of the New Yorker article. You can read the analysis in pdf format or Scribd…

View PDF version
View on Scribd

The ‘Pentagon Papers’ by Daniel Ellsberg was a CIA Psyop to Divert Attention from the Phoenix Program and Probes into Their Drug Smuggling

Official narrative: In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a leading Vietnam war strategist, concludes that America’s role in the war is based on decades of lies. He leaks 7,000 pages of top-secret documents to the New York Times, a daring act of conscience that leads directly to Watergate, President Nixon’s resignation and the end of the Vietnam […]

J.R.R. Tolkien Publishes ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

The Lord of the Rings is an epic tale of good and evil, centering around a lowly hobbit’s quest to destroy the One Ring with its magical power before it falls into the hands of Sauron, the dark lord. The story is well-known by now, if not in its own right then from the popular Hollywood adaptations of the tale. But what is the deeper significance of the story? What does the ring really stand for? Is the ring a symbol of our quest for political power, and if so, then was Tolkein an anarchist?  Andrew Hoffman, co-host of the Revelations Radio News podcast and author of The New World Order and the Eugenics Wars discusses Tolkien and The Lord of the Rings in the video below.

(Mises) A 1997 readers’ poll conducted by Britain’s Channel 4 and the Waterstone’s bookstore chain voted J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings the “greatest book of the century.” A 1999 poll of customers went even further, choosing it as the “greatest book of the millenium.” And now, Peter Jackson’s dramatization of The Fellowship of the Ring confirms itself a widely announced blockbuster. Some consider The Lord of Rings a childish fable, but millions of people all over the world have found it an enjoyable and inspiring read.

Hardcore environmentalists have tried to enlist Mr. Tolkien among them, focusing on Tolkien’s candid love for nature, for example. But if loving nature necessarily implies you are an environmentalist, people like Ludwig von Mises should also have been very sympathetic toward the Green movement. Indeed, as Justin Raimondo points out, his point wasn’t to bash industry or capitalism; it was to illustrate that evil is expansionist and projects itself even on the landscape. Hence bad environmental aesthetics are a reflection of bad rulers, which is to say, the use of power.

And here we have the correct understanding of the theme of the novel: it is about the evils of power. More precisely, the book aligns itself against power–not “economic power” or “social power”, but specifically political power. This is also the central theme of the classical liberal political tradition.

This has been explained in various occasions by Tolkien himself:

“You can make the Ring into an allegory of our own time, if you like: and allegory of the inevitable fate that waits for all attempts to defeat evil power by power” (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, 1995, p. 121.)

“Power is an ominous and sinister word in all these tales” (p. 152.)

“The story is cast in terms of a good side, and a bad side, beauty against ruthless ugliness, tyranny against kingship, moderated freedom with consent against compulsion that has long lost any object save mere power, and so on” (pp. 178-179.)

“In my story Sauron represents as near an approach to the wholly evil will as is possible. He had gone the way of all tyrants: beginning well, at least on the level that while desiring to order all things according to his own wisdom he still at first considered the (economic) well-being of other inhabitants of Earth. But he went further than human tyrants in pride and the lust for domination, being in origin an immortal (angelic) spirit” (p. 243.)

“Of course my story is not an allegory of Atomic power, but of Power (exerted for domination)” (p. 246.)

So, we can say The Lord of the Rings fictionalize Edmund Burke’s motto: “In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing, the Thing itself is the Abuse!” That’s what Tolkien is trying to convey and dramatize in a novel over 600,000 words long.

The Lord of the Rings is the epic journey to destroy the One Ring, which symbolizes power – and this is very clear when you understand that the Ring not only confers power but also imposes serfdom on the wearer. The man who wears the Ring becomes a slave at the same time as he is made supremely powerful.

This is an allegory for what actually happens in our world every day: rulers, even well intentioned and idealistic ones, are ruled themselves at the same time. They are ruled by consensus and by the spasmodic hunger to acquire yet more power than they already have. This is why the state has never been limited, as the classical liberal thinkers had hoped it would be – because the people in charge of keeping the power of the state limited never do so. Politicians and rulers generally, always want to become more important and more respected – more powerful, in short.

It does not matter what stirring words a politician uses to legitimize his actions; he is inside a vicious circle he can’t escape. As Edmund Burke put it many years ago, “Ask of politicians the ends for which laws were originally designed, and they will answer that laws were designed as a protection for the poor and weak (…) but surely no pretence can be so ridiculous (…).” (Edmund Burke, A Vindication of Natural Society, 1756).

Tolkien was fond of that idea. Indeed, he went one step further, saying, “My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs) – or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy. I would arrest anybody who uses the word state (in any sense other than the inanimate realm of England and its inhabitants, a thing that has neither power, rights nor mind); and after a chance of recantation, execute them if they remained obstinate!” (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, 1995, p. 63.; See NYT Review.)

In Tolkien’s vision, the power is always evil – a good power cannot even exist. Since the very beginning, the good guys own the Ring. Since it is the most powerful weapon in the world, many of them ask why it can’t be used against Sauron, the Dark Lord. Even though the Ring was forged by him and undoubtedly it is evil, yet it could help to pursue a good end, they suspect. This is an extraordinary way to ask the question: could the means be subordinated to the ends? Can a good end be pursued by evil means? Tolkin answers that no, evil means can only bring to an evil end – no matter if the original intentions are good.

When Frodo offers him the Ring, the wise Gandalf cries:

“No! With that power I should have power too great and terrible. And over me the Ring would gain a power still greater and more deadly! Do not tempt me! For I do not wish to become like the Dark Lord himself. Yet the way of the Ring to my heart is by pity, pity for weakness and the desire of strenght to do good. Do not tempt me! I dare not take it, not even to keep it safe, unused” (The Lord of the Rings, 2001, p. 60.)

Frodo also offers the Ring to Galadriel, queen of Elves. She refuses it too. Hear her words:

“I do not deny that my heart has greatly desired to ask what you offer. For many long years I had pondered what I might do, should the Great Ring come into my hands, and behold! It was brought within my grasp. The evil that was devised long ago works on in many ways, whether Sauron himself stands or falls. Would not have been a noble deed to set to the credit of his Ring, if I had taken it by force or fear from my guest? And now at last it comes. You will give me the Ring freely! In place of the Dark Lord you will set up a Queen. And I shall not be dark, but beautiful and terrible as the Morning and the Night! Fair as the Sea and the Sun and the Snow upon the Mountain! Dreadful as the Storm and the Lightning! Stronger than the foundations of the earth. All shall love me and despair!… I pass the test. I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel” (pp. 356-357.)

The reason why both Gandalf and Galadriel fear the power of the Ring is that they recognize that it was made to do bad, and therefore any good action made by it will turn into evil. In the words of the Lord of Rivendell, Elrond,

“We cannot use the Ruling Ring. That we now know too well. It belongs to Sauron and was made by him alone, and is altogether evil. Its strength is too great for anyone to wield at will, save only those who have already a great power of their own. But for them it holds an even deadlier peril. The very desire of it corrupts the heart. If any of the Wise should with this Ring overthrow the Lord of Mordor, using his own arts, he would then set himself on Sauron’s throne, and yet another Dark Lord would appear. And that is another reason why the Ring should be destroyed: as long as it is in the world it will be a danger even to the Wise. For nothing is evil in the beginning. Even Sauron was not so. I fear to take the Ring to hide it. I will not take the Ring to wield it.” (p. 261.)

We can also affirm that Tolkien somehow had a clear perception regarding those myths that professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe has recently dismantled in his masterpiece Democracy: The God That Failed (Transaction Publisher, 2001). Of them, according to Hoppe, “the first and most fundamental is the myth that the emergence of states out of a prior, non-statist order has caused subsequent economic and civilizational progress. In fact, theory dictates that any progress must have occurred in spite – not because – of the institution of a state.”

Then, we have the myth, writes Hoppe:

[that] concerns the historic transition from absolute monarchies to democratic states. (.) is near-universal agreement that democracy represents an advance over monarchy and is the cause of economic and moral progress. This interpretation is curious in light of the fact that democracy has been the fountainhead of every form of socialism: of (European) democratic socialism and (American) liberalism and neo-conservatism as well as of international (Soviet) socialism, (Italian) fascism, and national (Nazi) socialism. More importantly, however, theory contradicts this interpretation; whereas both monarchies and democracies are deficient as states, democracy is worse than monarchy”.

Mr. Tolkien wrote something very similar in a letter addressed to his son, Christopher:

 “If we could get back to personal names, it would do a lot of good. Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and the process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people. If people were in the habit of referring to ‘King George’s council, Winston and his gang’, it would do a long way to clearing thought, and reducing the frightful landslide into Theyocracy” (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, 1995, p. 63.)

No character in Lord of the Rings is “perfect” or “immaculate”. Each one is a mixture of good and evil, and time after time he or she is called on to choose between a good and an evil action. Nevertheless, “Good” and “Evil” do exist, and – even though people may doubt or may not correctly distinguish one from the other – the two sides are clearly separated. This, of course, is the leading reason why the One Ring can only do bad – it’s a constant temptation to one’s evil side. Even the best man in the world would surrender it sooner or later.

Only from this perspective is it possible to see things with Tolkien’s realistic eyes. He did recognize that people are good and bad, and some of them may freely choose evil and even find it pleasant. This is the consequence of the Fall: human beings are not perfect, and therefore every means of dominion is evil in itself. In fact, “The proper study of Man is anything but Man; and the most improper job of any man, even saints (who at any rate were at least unwilling to take it on), is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit to it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity” (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, 1995, p. 64.)

One of the most controversial characters of The Lord of the Rings, Saruman, was a wise wizard before surrendering to the flatteries of absolute power (which, in the words of Lord Acton, “corrupts absolutely”). Trying to convince Gandalf to join him, he says:

“The Elder days are gone. The Middle Days are passing. The Younger Days are beginning. The time of Elves is over, but our time is at hand: the world of Men, which We must rule. But we must have power, power to order all things as we will, for that good which only the Wise can see… A new Power [the evil Sauron’s, the Ring maker] is rising. Against it the old allies and policies will not avail us at all. There is no hope left in Elves or dying Nùmenor. This then is one choice before you, before us. We may join with the Power. It would be wise, Gandalf. There is hope that way. Its victory is at hand; and there will be rich reward for those that aided it. As the Power grows, its proved friends will also grow; and the Wise, such as you and I, may with patience come at last to direct its courses, to control it. We can bide our time, we can keep our thoughts in our hearts, deploring maybe evils done by the way, but approving the high and ultimate purpose: Knowledge, Rule, Order, all things that we have so far striven in vain to accomplish, hindered rather than helped by our weak or idle friends. There need not be, there would not be any real change in our designs, only in our means.”

Gandalf answers, “I would not give it [the One Ring], nay, neither news of it to you, now that I learn your mind. You were head of the Council, but you have unmasked yourself at last. Well, the choices are, it seems, to submit to Sauron, or to yourself. I will take neither” (The Lord of the Rings, 2001, pp. 252-253.)

As Tom Shippey points out,

“What Saruman says encapsulates many of the things the modern world has learnt to dread most: the ditching of allies, the subordination of means to ends, the ‘conscious acceptance of guilt in the necessary murder’. But the way he puts it is significant too. No other character in Middle Earth has Saruman’s trick of balancing phrases against each other so that incompatibles are resolved, and none comes out with words as empty as ‘deploring’, ‘ultimate’, worst of all, ‘real’… None of them but Saruman pays any attention to expediency, practicability, Realpolitik, ‘political realism'” (The Road to Middle Earth, 1992, pp. 108-110.)

One might object that the contemporary era implies a sort of “end of history,” because democracy is perceived as the “best form of government,” and provides the illusion that no government governs without the consent of the governed. Tolkien would have not agreed. Indeed, as he wrote, “I am not a ‘democrat’ only because ‘humility’ and equality are spiritual principles corrupted by the attempt to mechanize and formalize them, with the result that we get not universal smallness and humility, but universal greatness and pride, till some Orc gets hold of a ring of power–and then we get and are getting slavery” (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, 1995, p. 246).

Hugh Hefner Published the first Playboy magazine, Featuring Marilyn Monroe on the Cover and Nude Centerfold

In 1953, Hugh Hefner setup Playboy, which was eventually revealed to be banked by the CIA and the fist issue was realeased on December 1st of that year with actress Marilyn Monroe, an MK-Ultra Controlled sex slave, featured on the cover and as the centerfold and “Sweetheart of the Month”, which was thereafter termed the “Playmates of the Month”.

According to Ex CIA operative Laurel Aston, in his book Fighting Child and Human Trafficking and Slavery: “I knew Hugh Hefner. He is connected to the CIA.

“Hefner is a CIA programmer, CIA sex slave handler and pimp.”

“Hefner was also a part of running MK ULTRA super assassins and ops.”

Laurel Aston Ex. C.I.A. Whistle Blower

“The “White Rabbit” in Disney’s primary MK Programmimg film “Alice In Wonderland” reinforces MK Programming (ALTERS) or mind files as does Playboy bunny logo for Hugh Hefner’s MK factory, Playboy Enterprises …”

Hefner’s Sex Kittens are raised in communal type environments to centralize programmers/handlers’ supervision of individuals, group sessions and rituals. It also provides a centralized location for sex trade– twinning- among the women, and a place for clients of Hefner’s inner circle orgies that reinforce Sex Kitten/Slave programming and training. As a survivor of the 60s and 70s Deep State. I was a 4 yr old Honey Pot at Deep Creek Lodge under MKUltra (yes, where Frank Olson was slipped LSD too). It was their Blackmail Emporium back then, like Playboy Mansion, et al… I Stand With You @GenFlynn! GOD STANDS WITH YOU TOO!The #Secret #Playboy Mansion #Tunnels That Led To #Hollywood #Celebrities: via @JonExArmy’s

The above image of Hefner as the Greek God Pan is a mural made for Playboy’s annual Dionysian orgy. According to the forbidden knowledge, Pan is “man himself” who falls as LUCIFER from the heavens onto the world of matter. According to Anton LeVay’s Satanic Bible, Pan is one of the infernal names of SATAN.”

Marilyn Monroe never actually signed an agreement to be in Playboy. Before Monroe hit it big, she was in need of cash. In 1949, she posed nude for photographer Tom Kelley in exchange for fifty dollars. Kelley sold his photos of Monroe to Western Lithograph Company, which made calendars. Four years later, Monroe’s images resurfaced when Hefner purchased Kelley’s photos of Monroe with “nothing but the radio on” from the Chicago calendar maker for $500, according to the LA Times. After the publication, Monroe made the decision to do an interview in which she explained that she had been desperate for money when she posed for the nude photos. And it didn’t seem to negatively affect her career at all. She also developed a close relationship with Hefner.

Having been influenced by scientific fraud and pedophile (this is now established fact. Read here) Alfred Kinsey. As I wrote in 2009, “Hefner founded Playboy magazine … the same year that Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Was this a coincidence? Well, Hefner read Sexual Behavior in the Human Male when he was young and wrote about it in a college publication, and the work convinced him that he had been lied to by the wider society.… [Hefner said] ‘I refer to it [Kinsey’s Human Female book] in the introduction to the first [Playboy] issue; I called it ‘the other great book that was coming out in 1953.’”

In that first run, Hefner sold 54,175 copies of Playboy magazine at 50 cents each. This first edition of the magazine is also the only Playboy that does not have Hugh Hefner’s name inside. On the first page, Hefner humorously wrote, “We want to make it clear from the very start, we aren’t a ‘family magazine.’ If you’re somebody’s sister, wife or mother-in-law and picked us up by mistake, please pass us along to the man in your life and get back to your Ladies Home Companion.” Copies of the first issue in mint to near mint condition can sell for over $5,000 today. The magazine played an important role in the ‘sexual revolution’ that has led to the moral destruction of America’s formerly strong Christian heritage. Theremains one of the world’s best-known brands. 64 years later the magazine has grown into Playboy Enterprises, Inc., with a presence in nearly every medium. In addition to the flagship magazine in the United States, special nation-specific versions of Playboy are published worldwide.

“MK-Ultra Monarch Programmer/Handler … Hugh Hefner enriched himself as America’s # 1 MK Pimp for over 50 years, supplying Global Mgt. Team and whoever else had codes “triggers” and enough money to afford “state of the art” Oz-Dorothy, Jewel programmed DID (MPD) lovelies. This NSA-CIA asset w/his degree in psychology (read Mind Control Programmer) controlled an army of BETA-trained Sex Slaves available for blackmail, espionage (honeypots), underground porn and whatever else their “ALTERS” (mind files) were programmed for. Hefner worked closely with MK Programmer/handler Heinz (Henry) Kissinger, and operated under full protection of NSA/CIA military-apparatus.”

The 1974 death of 1968 Playmate of the Month, Paige Young, is linked to Hugh Hefner and Bill Cosby who used her as a personal “Sex Toy.” When Paige took her life on a Palm Sunday, she wanted to make a statement and stir an investigation into Hefner’s Satanic Playboy Circle, she left pictures of Hefner labeled the DEVIL, and a large pentagram that had nothing to do with the five wounds of Christ on the floor of her Hollywood apartment. Undoubtedly, she was trying to tell us about repressed memories of a PENTAGRAM being a central part of a Ritual to indoctrinate her into the Cult.

Nested in the hills overlooking HollyWeird, Lookout Mountain Laboratory was originally envisioned as a U.S. Air Defense Department center. Built in 1941 and nestled in two-and-a-half secluded acres off what is now Wonderland Park Avenue, the installation was hidden from view and surrounded by an electrified fence.

Marilyn Monroe’s February 8, 1953 Secret Pentagon ID to Lookout Mountain Lab Picture Squadron) secured a 21/2 acre house on Wonderland Park Avenue and turned it into a top-secret electrical fenced movie production house identified as the Lookout Mountain Laboratory. It is claimed that it was perhaps the world’s only completely self-contained movie studio. With 100,000 square feet of floor space, the covert studio included sound stages, screening rooms, film processing labs, editing facilities, an animation department, and seventeen climate-controlled film vaults. It also had underground parking, a helicopter pad and a bomb shelter. [19]

Lookout Mountain Laboratory had something to do with the Cold War developing secret weapon testing films for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). The existence of this facility wasn’t acknowledged until the early 90’s even though it had produced some 19,000 government propaganda films, and had the likes of John Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Howard Hawks, Ronald Reagan, Bing Crosby, Walt Disney and Marilyn Monroe working there with top-secret clearances on (MK ULTRA) “undisclosed projects”[20]. Hollywood civilian studio staff from Warner Brothers, Metro-Goldwyn Mayer and RKO also worked alongside its military staff as producers, cameramen and directors.[21]

The lab conducted secret experiments and shot military training films and documentaries here until the clandestine studio was decommissioned in 1969 [22] most likely after or just prior to the August 8 Tate-LaBianca Massacre, (hippie/race war psyop). The savage, grizzly and cold blood murders of 6 white people at 10050 Cielo Drive in Benedict Canyon, just a couple miles to the west of Laurel Canyon, had been originally blamed on Black Nationalist, the Black Panther Party for Self Defense (Helter Skelter)[23]

The road to the U.S. Military Top-Secret Lookup Mountain Laboratory should almost face Rubin’s studio mansion on Laurel Canyon Blvd. When fascist rock star David Bowie wanted to delve into Kabalism (the religious mystical and magical system of Judaism), he just happened to seek out Rick Rubin and Houdini’s Mansion.

In 2009, the lonely and desperate cry of Sheri Denise Allred was briefly heard. She made a hopeless attempt to expose Hugh Hefner’s ultra secret and elite CIA/MK ULTRA pedophile ring and Dionysian Cult by filing a badly drafted pro se complaint for damages in the Los Angeles Superior Court.[15] She claimed that she had been ritually sexually abused by Hefner’s Luciferian Circle since 5 years old. According to MK ULTRA usual practices, age 5 and below is the idea impressionate period to begin slitting off alternative personalities from the original personality to create multiple personality disordered mind control subjects.

Sheri talked about having a hat covering her head where everyone in the world can hear her thoughts and transfer thoughts to her hat from god. She may be talking about EEG Skull Caps that are able to read your brain waves for MK ULTRA projects, or implant brain electrodes and microchip brain implants. The technology to read your thoughts have existed for quite sometime.[16] However most interestingly, she talked wildly and extensively about things inside Hefner’s Dionysian Cult and pedophile ring that may have included John Gotti’s Mob, and billionaire J. Paul Getty.[17] She talked about Darren Elliott being involved. Darren Joseph Eliot is a Canadian sports broadcaster and a former professional Los Angeles Kings goaltender.[18]

She said that Hefner was supposed to be a “centaur of the greek gods.” She was programmed to be a “reincarnation” of “Venus Aphrodite Demilo.”[19] Aphrodite of Milos better known as the Venus de Milo, is an ancient Greek statue. Created sometime between 130 and 100 BC, it is believed to depict Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love and beauty (Venus to the Romans).[20]

Sheri’s complaint as filed is filled with grammatical errors, misspellings and what appears by first impressions to be off the wall references, but her spelling and references to Hefner’s Dionysian Cult and Greek Mythology are for the most part downright fairly consistently actuate. Similar, but going well beyond Bill Cosby’s allegations of rape and sexual abuses, Sheri’s case also involves drugs, Walt Disney mind control program themes, recovery of repressed memories, amnesia blocks,  and Luciferian layers. It is also interesting that she identified herself as “Allred”, like Attorney Gloria Allred, the Bill Cosby Gatekeeper.

Naomi Wolf has written,

The onslaught of porn is responsible for deadening male libido in relation to real women, and leading men to see fewer and fewer women as “porn-worthy.”  Far from having to fend off porn-crazed young men, young women are worrying that as mere flesh and blood, they can scarcely get, let alone hold, their attention.

Jill Filipovic takes a different view: 

What Hefner and Playboy never did was present women as human, or consider us anything like men. Hefner made female sex objects more relatable and accessible — the Playboy centerfold was the girl next door, not the famous movie actress —but this wasn’t so much an elevation as a downward shift: social permission for men to look at all women through the zipper in their jeans, and not even bother to pretend it was otherwise.

The CIA’s attempt to sexualize “the girl next door,” in a way that demeans her, leads young boys and men to feel uncomfortable expressing desire toward girls / women, while seeking refuge in masturbation. Pornography is an addictive behavior that is as powerful or moreso than heroin or cocaine. This has certainly been a huge tool for Satan in his plan to destroy the family and Christian values.

As early Playboy contributor Jules Feiffer put it, referencing the ’50s, “You couldn’t talk politically [not sure what that even means]…. You couldn’t use obscenities. What Playboy represented was the beginning of a break from all that.

Like Disney World, the Mansion has a secret underground complex.  At least it used to.  There were tunnels to the homes of Warren Beatty, James Caan, Kirk Douglas, and Jack Nicholson.  People came and went in secret.

Playmates Miki Garcia and Brenda MacKillop testified to the Meese Commission on Pornography that women were pressured into doing drugs and orgies.  Hefner would rape new “recruits.”  Naive teenagers thought they were networking in their modeling careers, or that Hefner would take no for answer.  Wide-eyed girls, understandably distracted by surroundings and celebrities, were easy prey.   It was simple to slip a Playmate the Micky Finn, so, after she passed out, her body could be violated.

Speaking to The New York PostStefan Tetenbaum remembers his time as Hefner’s personal valet from 1978 through 1979. Tetenbaum says all the encounters at Hefner orgies were filmed partly for blackmail purposes and that Hefner was ‘brutal’. He also said that there were plenty of drugs at the Playboy Mansion, especially cocaine.

Hugh Hefner was also gay or at least had experimented with it. Hefner girls, including Carrie Leigh, were disturbed by Hefner’s liking for sex with men. Leigh says she came across Hefner’s liaisons with men more than once. Carrie Leigh thought that Hefner’s only true interest in women was exploitive. Hefner admitted to having sex with men, and claimed to be bisexual, like Carrie Leigh. Hefner had gay sex at his Beverly Hills mansion.