Arab Spring

Most of this true history has been carefully suppressed by the western media. Ahmed Bensaada’s 2011 book L’Arabesque Américaine concerns the US government role in instigating, funding and coordinating the Arab Spring “revolutions” and devotes much more attention to the personalities leading the 2011 uprisings. It was planned by the Obama administration and overseen by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Some openly admitted to receiving CIA funding. Others had no idea because it was deliberately concealed from them. A few (in Egypt and Syria) were officially charged with espionage. In Egypt, seven sought refuge in the US embassy in Cairo and had to be evacuated by the State Department.

The Arab Spring was nothing less than a US-UK-Israeli enterprise designed to accelerate the Greater Israel Project.  The advancement of this particular project is central to the reason why Obama was installed as POTUS and Clinton as SOS.  These two co-conspirators formed a tag team whose mission it was to turn the Mideast into a dystopian apocalyptic wasteland. And so they have.

Because Clinton and Obama collaborated so closely to implement the CIA-designed scheme known as the Arab Spring, they have been obligated to provide each other cover. Were all 31,000 plus emails to be made available for public scrutiny, it would be revealed that Obama is as guilty in the Emailgate fiasco as Clinton is.  He was also a party to her illegal server since he corresponded with her using that email while transmitting highly classified information.

The ultra-secret info and classified data, related directly to the execution of the CIA’s Operation Arab Spring, forms the very basis for Emailgate and Servergate. Both Clinton and Obama conspired unceasingly to deceive the American people into believing that this was an organic, home-gown movement when in fact the C.I.A. & Company paid out millions of US dollars to get the various countrymen to the city squares to protest. This highly coordinated black operation is still the best kept secret in Washington, as it is throughout the power capitals of the world.  And so it better be for their sake, since the very creation of ISIS was a central part of their patently illicit and traitorous plan.

Given the intense scrutiny that Donald Trump operates under every single day of his campaign it ought to be understood that he would not accuse President Obama of creating ISIS unless it was true.  He has also identified Secretary of State Clinton of being a co-founder.  Clearly, Trump is in the possession of classified information which proves his point that Obama and Clinton were both instrumental in the establishment of the Islamic State, the support of ISIL expansion, and the arming of the Daesh across the Northern Levant.

Not once, but twice did Donald Trump make these radioactive allegations about the Obama-Clinton crime team.  The second time he labelled Obama the MVP of ISIS and asserted how much the Daesh worshipped Obama.  As follows:

It’s true that SOS Clinton and husband Bill functioned as a parallel government throughout her tenure at State.  This extremely unusual and unlawful arrangement was necessary in order to implement so much of the Arab Spring subversive activities which had to be hidden from the American people.  Were the truth to be known about the degree of outright criminality that was perpetrated, they both would have been permanently barred from participating in political life, if not banished altogether from the USA.  Yes, their collective malfeasance and perfidy, malevolence and treachery are unparalleled in U.S. history.

Buried amid tens of thousands of pages of former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s secret emails, made public by the US Government after FOIA requests, is a devastating email exchange between Clinton and her confidential adviser, Sid Blumenthal. It’s about Qaddafi and the US-coordinated intervention in 2011 to topple the Libyan ruler. It’s about gold and a potentially existential threat to the future of the US dollar as world reserve currency. It’s about Qaddafi’s plans then for the gold-based Dinar for Africa and the Arab oil world. Read more on this astounding discovery by William Engdahl here…

Democracy: America’s Biggest Export

According to Bensaada, the MENA Arab Spring revolutions have four unique features in common:

  • None were spontaneous – all required careful and lengthy (5+ years) planning, by the State Department, CIA pass through foundations, George Soros, and the pro-Israel lobby.1
  • All focused exclusively on removing reviled despots without replacing the autocratic power structure that kept them in power.
  • No Arab Spring protests made any reference whatsoever to powerful anti-US sentiment over Palestine and Iraq.
  • All the instigators of Arab Spring uprisings were middle class, well educated youth who mysteriously vanished after 2011.

Nonviolent Regime Change

Bensaada begins by introducing non-violent guru Gene Sharp (see The CIA and Nonviolence), his links with the Pentagon and US intelligence, and his role, as director of the Albert Einstein Institution, in the “color” revolutions.2 in Eastern Europe and the attempted coup against Hugo Chavez in 2002.))

The US goal in the Arab Spring revolutions was to replace unpopular despotic dictators while taking care to maintain the autocratic US-friendly infrastructure that had brought them to power. All initially followed the nonviolent precepts Sharp outlines in his 1994 book From Dictatorship to Democracy. In Libya, Syria and Yemen, the US and their allies were clearly prepared to introduce paid mercenaries when their Sharpian “revolutions” failed to produce regime change.

Follow the Money

Relying mainly on Wikileaks cables and the websites of key CIA pass through foundations (which he reproduces in the appendix), Bensaada methodically lists every State Department conference and workshop the Arab Spring heroes attended, the dollar amounts spent on them by the State Department and key “democracy” promoting foundations3, the specific involvement of Google, Facebook, Twitter and Obama’s 2008 Internet campaign team in training Arab Spring cyperactivists in encryption technologies and social media skills, US embassy visits, and direct encounters with Hillary Clinton,  Condoleezza Rice, John McCain, Barack Obama and Serbian trainers from CANVAS (the CIA-backed organization that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in 2000).

Bensaada focuses most heavily on the Tahrir Square uprising in Egypt. The Washington Post has estimated approximately 10,000 Egyptians took part in NED and USAID training in social media and nonviolent organizing techniques. For me the most astonishing information in this chapter concerned the role of an Egyptian exile (a former Egyptian policeman named Omar Afifi Suleiman) in coordinating the Tahrir Square protests from his office in Washington DC. According to Wikileaks, NED paid Suleiman a yearly stipend of $200,000+ between 2008-2011.

When Nonviolence Fails

Arabesques$ devotes far more attention to Libya, Syria and Yemen than Bensaada’s first book.

In the section on Libya, Bensaada zeroes in on eleven key US assets who engineered the overthrow of Gaddafi. Some participated in the same State Department trainings as the Middle East opposition activists and instigated nonviolent Facebook and Twitter protests to coincide with the 2011 uprisings in Tunisian and Egypt. Others, in exile, underwent guerrilla training sponsored by the CIA, Mossad, Chad and Saudi Arabia. A few months after Gaddafi’s assassination, some of these same militants would lead Islamic militias attempting to overthrow Assad in Syria.

Between 2005 and 2010, the State Department funneled $12 million to opposition groups opposed to Assad. The US also financed Syrian exiles in Britain to start an anti-government cable TV channel they beamed into Syria.

In the section on Syria, Bensaada focuses on a handful of Syrian opposition activists who received free US training in cyberactivism and nonviolent resistance beginning in 2006. One, Ausama Monajed, is featured in the 2011 film How to Start a Revolution about a visit with Gene Sharp in 2006. Monajed and others worked closely with the US embassy, funded by the Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI). This is a State Department program that operates in countries (such as Libya and Syria) where USAID is banned.

In February 2011, these groups posted a call on Twitter and Facebook for a Day of Rage. Nothing happened. When Sharpian techniques failed to produce a sizable nonviolent uprising, as in Libya, they and their allies (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and Jordan) were all set up to introduce Islamic mercenaries (many directly from Libya) to declare war on the Assad regime.

  1. I was astonished to learn that Forum Fikra, a forum for Arab activists working against authoritarian governments, was mainly funded by the Nathan and Esther K Wagner Family Foundation. The latter also funds numerous pro-Israel groups and projects, as well as the Washington Institute for Near East policy (a pro-Israel group with close ties to AIPAC).
  2. The color revolutions were CIA-instigated uprisings that replaced democratically elected pro-Russian governments with equally autocratic governments more friendly to US corporate interests:
    Serbia (2000) – Bulldozer Revolution
    Georgia (2002) – Rose Revolution
    Ukraine (2004) – Orange Revolution
    Kyrgyzstan (2005) – Tulip Revolution
  3. Democracy promoting foundations (as used here, “democracy” is synonymous with capitalism, ie favorable to the interests of US investors). Here are seven of the main ones involved in funding and training Arab Spring activists:
    • USAID (US Agency for International Development) – State Department agency charged with economic development and humanitarian aid with a long history of financing destabilization activities, especially in Latin America.
     NED (National Endowment for Democracy) – national organization supported by State Department and CIA funding dedicated to the promotion of democratic institutions throughout the world, primary funder of IRI and NDI.
    • IRI (International Republican Institute) – democracy promoting organization linked with the Republican Party, currently chaired by Senator John McCain and funded by NED.
    • NDI (National Democratic Institute for International Affairs) – democracy promoting organization linked with the Democratic Party, currently chaired by Madeline Albright and funded by NED.
    • OSI (Open Society Institute) – founded by George Soros in 1993 to help fund color revolutions in Eastern Europe. Also contributed major funding to Arab Spring revolutions.
    • Freedom House – US organization that supports nonviolent citizens initiatives in societies were liberty is denied or threatened, financed by USAID, NED and the Soros Foundation.
    • CANVAS (Center for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies) – center originally founded by the Serbian activists of Otpor who the US funded and trained to over throw Slobodan Milosevic and who were instrumental in training Arab Spring activists. Funded by Freedom House, IRI and George Soros


Flynn case

Genral Michael Flynn pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying to the FBI. He later withdrew his plea as exculpatory evidence emerged. Flynn served in the U.S. Army for three decades. He also served as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) under President Barack Obama. However, he felt Obama was not pursuing terrorists aggressively enough. He was eventually fired.

He saw an opportunity to advocate for his views in Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. A crowd favorite, Flynn was the warmup speaker for Trump on the campaign trail. When Trump won, he named Flynn his National Security Advisor. Flynn spent the transition planning an overhaul of national security strategy; his work continues to shape Trump’s policies.

The defeated campaign of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed that Russian interference had cost her the election. Senior Obama administration officials also told the media that they believed Trump had colluded with Russia. They identified Flynn as a potential link to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and warned Trump’s transition team about him.

During the transition, Flynn had conversations with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, among other foreign officials. Flynn urged Russia not to escalate its response to Obama administration sanctions for election interference, and explored the possibility that Russia might oppose an anti-Israel resolution at the UN Security Council that had Obama’s tacit blessing. These conversations were picked up by intelligence surveillance of the ambassador; they would later leak to the media, after officials — presumably, a senior official within the Obama administration — had “unmasked” Flynn’s name in the transcripts.

The FBI investigated Flynn, but found no evidence of any wrongdoing. The agency prepared to close the case, but senior officials decided to keep it open, ostensibly pursuing a theory that Flynn had violated the Logan Act, an obscure, centuries-old law that prohibits private citizens from conducting diplomacy, and which has never been prosecuted successfully.

In a fateful Oval Office meeting on Jan. 5, 2017, at which Obama’s senior national security officials were present, including then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-FBI Director James Comey discussed the investigation of Flynn. According to a memo later written by outgoing National Security Advisor Susan Rice, Obama told Comey to proceed with inquiries “by the book.” There is some dispute as to whether Biden suggested or discussed the possibility of using the Logan Act as a pretext.

Later that month, after Flynn had taken up his position at the White House, Comey sent FBI agents to interview him there, advising him not to bring counsel. Notes suppressed by the FBI but later revealed indicated that the FBI agents had discussed whether their purpose was to have him fired, or prosecuted. Flynn was not told that he was being investigated. He was asked about his conversations with the Russian ambassador. Agents later reported that they did not believe he was lying to them.

However, after the contents of the surveillance intercepts were leaked to the Washington Post, Flynn was accused of having lied, both to the FBI and to Vice President Mike Pence, who had defended Flynn several weeks before. By the second week of February, Flynn was forced to resign. He was later prosecuted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller as part of the inquiry into alleged “Russia collusion.” Flynn accepted a plea deal that required him to cooperate with the investigation, which he did; it later emerged that prosecutors had also pressured Flynn, ostensibly by threatening to prosecute his son as well.

Flynn’s sentencing was delayed while he continued cooperating with Mueller. But details of problems within the Mueller investigation began to emerge, such as the deep anti-Trump bias of senior FBI agent Peter Strzok. In a sentencing hearing, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan asked Flynn wished to withdraw his plea; Flynn declined. Sullivan had to apologize to Flynn after accusing him of betraying his country, apparently believing — incorrectly — that Flynn was accused of being a foreign agent.

Soon, however, Flynn obtained new defense counsel, replacing his lawyers from Covington & Burling with Sidney Powell. She believed that he had been framed, and portrayed him as a victim of a conspiracy by the outgoing Obama administration.

Flynn withdrew his guilty plea. Meanwhile, William Barr, who had taken over as Attorney General, prodded Mueller to release his findings. In March 2019, Barr revealed that Mueller had found no evidence whatsoever of “Russia collusion.”

Barr also brought in U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Jensen to review the prosecution’s behavior in the Flynn case. Jensen found several irregularities, including exculpatory evidence that had not been provided to the evidence as required by law.

The Department of Justice soon asked to drop the prosecution. But Judge Sullivan refused. He suggested that Flynn might be prosecuted for criminal contempt of court for initially pleading guilty, and invited amicus briefs to make that argument. He also appointed retired Judge John Gleason, who had already publicly alleged a political conspiracy in the DOJ, to file a brief.

Powell, on Flynn’s behalf, appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus to force Judge Sullivan to drop the case. In a 2-1 decision, a panel of the court agreed. But Sullivan appealed the decision to an en banc hearing of the entire court, and the earlier decision was overturned. The case returned to the trial court, where it remained until President Trump pardoned him. Judge Sullivan was accused of “prosecutor shopping,” waiting for a new administration to appoint new prosecutors to the case.

Many pundits on the left clung to the belief that Flynn was guilty, or that he was the beneficiary of political interference by Trump in the DOJ. On the right, however, Flynn was seen as an innocent man framed as part of the Democrats’ vendetta.

One of those who falsely accused Flynn was none other than Jake Sullivan, whom Joe Biden has named as his National Security Adviser. Having smeared Flynn with false allegations of Russia collusion, Sullivan stands ready to take his job.

Flynn’s finances were ruined by the prosecution, as well as his opportunity to serve in the Trump administration. He has, until now, been relatively silent about his opinions. On Wednesday, Flynn appeared to react to the pardon with a Bible verse:

The reference is to Jeremiah 1:19: “And they shall fight against thee; but they shall not prevail against thee; for I am with thee, saith the Lord, to deliver thee.”

It was not the exoneration Flynn might have wanted, nor will it make him whole, or silence his critics, or restore faith in the justice system. But to millions of Americans, Flynn’s pardon is, at long last, the least he deserved.

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany released the following statement on Flynn’s pardon:

Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Grant of Clemency granting a Full Pardon to General Michael T. Flynn. The President has pardoned General Flynn because he should never have been prosecuted. An independent review of General Flynn’s case by the Department of Justice—conducted by respected career professionals—supports this conclusion. In fact, the Department of Justice has firmly concluded that the charges against General Flynn should be dropped. This Full Pardon achieves that objective, finally bringing to an end the relentless, partisan pursuit of an innocent man.

General Flynn should not require a pardon. He is an innocent man. Even the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn did not think he was lying. Multiple investigations have produced evidence establishing that General Flynn was the victim of partisan government officials engaged in a coordinated attempt to subvert the election of 2016. These individuals sought to prevent Donald Trump from being elected to the Presidency, to block him from assuming that office upon his election, to remove him from office after his inauguration, and to undermine his Administration at every turn.

The prosecution of General Flynn is yet another reminder of something that has long been clear: After the 2016 election, individuals within the outgoing administration refused to accept the choice the American people had made at the ballot box and worked to undermine the peaceful transition of power. These efforts were enabled by a complicit media that willingly published falsehoods and hid inconvenient facts from public view, including with respect to General Flynn. They amounted to a brazen assault on our democracy and a direct attack on our fundamental political values.

While today’s action sets right an injustice against an innocent man and an American hero, it should also serve as a reminder to all of us that we must remain vigilant over those in whom we place our trust and confidence. The people who sit atop our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have tremendous power to affect the lives of their fellow citizens. The American people must always take care to scrutinize their actions, to hold them accountable, and to ensure that they use their immense power to uphold the rule of law rather than to harass, persecute, and jail their political opponents in pursuit of partisan political agendas.

Happy Thanksgiving to General Flynn and his family, and thank you all for your great service to our Nation!

Source: Breitbart

See the Flynn case documents HERE

Dominion Voting Systems

A Clinton Foundation / Pelosi / Feinstein / Soros / Obama / China and Mueller-connected China-owned software company with HQ’s in Toronto (U.S. HQ’s in Denver) founded in 2002. It has a long history of allegation of election rigging and interference in elections of various nations, including census data theft in India and interference in US Elections of 2020. According to sworn witness testimony gathered by Sidney Powell and the Trump Election fraud prosecution team of why the software was designed: It was designed to rig elections. DSV claims to work with 2000 voting jurisdictions in 33 states1 including Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Arizona, and Nevada – all contested swing states in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election in which the fake news media refused to declare President Trump the winner on Election night in spite of a victory, and declared Joe Biden President four days later after massive fraud. They’re the 2nd largest voting vendor in the U.S. behind Election Systems & Software. Dominion carries out in-house software development for its customers in the U.S., Canada and Serbia.

“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”― Joseph Stalin

John Poulos was the face of the company before Congress, where he was peppered with questions about whether the company gets components from China. During congressional testimony in January, Poulos said: “We do have components in our products that come from China. Our tabulated products have always been manufactured in the united states.” He said the Chinese components included “LCD components, the actual glass screen on the interface down to the chip component level…there’s no option for manufacturing of those in the United States. We would welcome guidelines and best practices.

According to a court filing, Dominion owns patents linked to China. Dominion’s Trump-hater Eric Coomer is the inventor of the application. On page 16 of the legal filing filed by Sidney Powell following the 2020 Election, foreign actors (China & Iran specifically) having access to US elections is discussed. In addition, on page 8 of Sidney Powell’s election fraud filing in GA, we see Dominion – Edison has connections to domestic players:  One being Indivisible which was formerly Obama connected ACORN:

A 2014 State of California document indicates Dominion’s agent of record at that time was Boston lawyer Michael Bevilacqua of Wilmer Hale. Former special prosecutor Robert Mueller works for that firm. The Dominion firm made $44 million in 2012, according to the form. It listed its addresses for manufacturing and development as Toronto; Belgrade, Serbia; Denver; Plano, Texas; and Baldwin Park, California. A 2020 filing gives their registered agent as Cogency Global in Florida. Its directors were listed as Hootan Yaghoobzadeh of Staple Street Capital, Stephen Owens, also of Staple Street, and Benjamin Humphreys. Yaghoobzadeh and Owens have past ties to the Carlyle Group investment firm.

The China Connection

An investigation by Austin Security and Investigation Solutions into SEC filings has revealed that the firm which owns Dominion Voting Systems, Staple Street Capital, received $400 million dollars from a Swiss bank, UBS Securities, with close links to the Chinese government less than a month before the election. This was in addition to $200 million paid to Dominion from UBS in 2014. Aside from UBS, the other four owners of UBS Securities are all Communist Chinese front groups.

UBS Securities is closely linked to UBS’s Beijing-based joint venture. There, current and former board members are tied to Chinese communist military and intelligence agencies. In New York, three out of four UBS board members are Chinese. Some board members serve the company in New York and Beijing at the same time.

Dominion Voting Systems shares an office floor with the George Soros-funded left-wing Tides Foundation in Toronto, NATIONAL FILE reported. Their tipster made clear that “Soros people” are very close with Dominion, which has partnered with a voting technology company chaired by one of left-wing billionaire George Soros’ best friends and associates. Dominion was caught flipping votes from President Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 election, and Trump has cited data to accuse Dominion of widespread vote-flipping and vote-losing in key states. Dominion is headquartered in Toronto and has a U.S. office in Denver.

Also, National Pulse reported that Andy Huang, the Core Infrastructure Manager of Information Technology at Dominion Voting Systems, previously worked at the state-owned China Telecom. Interestingly, the boxes for Dominion Voting machines says “Made in China”:


Diebold Elections Systems Inc. is formed. Previously, DESI was run by Bob Urosevich, who worked in the election systems industry since 1976. In 1979, Mr. Urosevich founded American Information Systems. He served as the President of AIS, now known as Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S), from 1979 through 1992. Bob’s brother, Todd Urosevich, is Vice President, Aftermarket Sales with ES&S, DESI’s chief competitor. In 1995, Bob Urosevich started I-Mark Systems, whose product was a touch screen voting system utilizing a smart card and biometric encryption authorization technology. Global Election Systems, Inc. (GES) acquired I-Mark in 1997, and on July 31, 2000 Mr. Urosevich was promoted from Vice President of Sales and Marketing and New Business Development to President and Chief Operating Officer. On January 22, 2002, Diebold announced the acquisition of GES, then a manufacturer and supplier of electronic voting terminals and solutions. Global Election Systems subsequently changed its name to Diebold Election Systems, Inc.

Fast forward to the election year that followed the creation of Diebold Election Systems. There had been known glitches within Diebold’s software that could alter an election in other candidates favor. Multiple News Outlets wrote articles pertaining to the threat of Election Rigging via E-Voting. Those same media outlets now in 2020, that claim e-voting to be safe and not subject to tampering/glitches even whilst saying the exact opposite 15 years prior. Michael Meacher from “The Guardian” wrote this back in 2005.

“According to Harris, a manipulation technique she found in Diebold’s AccuVote central vote tabulator is able to read totals from an untraceable bogus vote set within its software. “By entering a two-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is created; and this set of votes can be changed in a matter of seconds, so that it no longer matches the correct votes,” she has said. And she has demonstrated this live on television. Her conclusion is: “You can easily edit the election.”

While Diebold denounced these claims, email threads I acquired through digging indicate their knowledge of said bugs in some form or another in their systems and how circumventing was done to avoid detection including halting google searches on the company and the keyword bug, as to not increase the chances of those two keywords coming up in the registry upon searching the company.

Attached below are a few separate emails from various members of the company. (At the end of this article I will post the rest of the email threads I have currently, as to not be selective in only picking out certain conversations.) Pay attention to the name Ian Piper in the separate email below as well. Though he didn’t partake in the email thread below regarding the glitch, he was the Compliance Officer of Diebold Election Systems. This is important in many ways.

A compliance officer is an individual who ensures that a company complies with its outside regulatory and legal requirements as well as internal policies and bylaws. Compliance officers have a duty to their employer to work with management and staff to identify and manage regulatory risk. Now to me, those emails though not too descriptive in detail clearly show knowledge of a said glitch, and an attempt to keep it off the radar somehow. As a Compliance Officer, I don’t think I’d be too off the mark in saying he too had knowledge of a good amount of what was going on within the company.

Shortly following these emails that year and the years following, Diebold Voting Systems were having many widespread irregularities occur. Some as severe as taking votes away from one candidate and transferring them over in favor of the other party/doctoring votes as described in this April 2004 Vanity Fair article written by Michael Shnayerson.

In 2006, Diebold decided to remove its name from the front of the voting machines for strategic reasons. In 2007, it changed its name to Premier Solution Systems. Election Systems & Software (ES&S) acquired Premier Election Solutions on September 3, 2009.

Continue Reading at The Gateway Pundit…

According to whistleblowers, Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden personally visited Serbia on May 20th 2009 to take part in a scheme that gave Democrats control of America’s Dominion voting machines in coordination with Eric Holder’s Justice Department. The plot is also linked to the Chinese, the Clinton Foundation, and George Soros. This article will take you through the entire globalist plot, step by step. That article states that:

Dana Jill Simpson and her husband Jim are election integrity and technology experts who have worked for Tides Foundation insiders (the Tides Canada Foundation shares office space in Toronto with Dominion Voting Systems’ headquarters). They are both anti-war progressives in the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democrat Party. Dana Jill Simpson has been investigating Dominion for years, and she brought her concerns about voter fraud to the FBI in 2016 — including information about Dominion — but the FBI ignored her pleas for help. Simpson said the scanners for Dominion are made by a company called Flextronics in Plano, Texas, whose CEO does business with the Chinese company Huawei.

The Obama-Biden administration literally gave Dominion its market share through a 2010 forced divestiture.

March 8, 2010 press release from Eric Holder’s Department of Justice entitled “Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems & Software/Premier Election Solutions Merger” announced that DOJ was forcing a divestiture of election technology from a top company. Dominion ended up getting that technology and thus nearly a third of the electronic voting systems market in America.

“Jim and I as an election team working for Harvard lawyer Cliff Arnebeck located all the DOJ Documents to prove how Dominion Voting owes its 30% Market share to an Obama-Biden DOJ Antitrust division sale done by Eric Holder. No party running for office should have any ties to a company but Biden while in office with Obama let Eric Holder handle this sale to their pet company Dominion. That my friends is as corrupt as it gets,” Dana Jill Simpson said.

The Science Defies Politics blog reported: “It is not clear what products or services the company has developed. It found almost no buyers, until Obama was elected in 2008. In 2009, New York ordered a few dozens of systems from it. In 2010, Obama’s DOJ (Holder – Mueller) took the EVS unit, purchased from Diebold, away from the market leader ES&S, and gave it to Dominion. This gift included the installed base of about 30% of the US electronic voting systems (EVS) market. Within two weeks, Dominion also acquired Sequoia, which was formally spun from Smartmatic, but ties between these two companies remained. Smartmatic is a UK based EVS vendor, whose software was used by Chavez to “win” the Venezuelan referendum in 2004. Smartmatic’s unit Sequoia faced troubles in the US. Those troubles quickly ended when its assets were purchased by Dominion.”
Read the full article…
See also brief history in report given to state legislatures by Trump Team HERE.


Dominion Voting Systems is subjected to multiple hardware, software, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities, as exemplified by various electronic voting equipment tests conducted by universities and state government officials. The Canadian company uses Smartmatic software, according to an affidavit of a high ranking Venezuelan military official who was present when Smartmatic was first used in Venezuelan elections.’

Dominion Voting Systems software is not PCI compliant and fails 10 of the 12 requirements. The 12 requirements for Payment Card Industry compliance are:

  1. Firewalls: block access of foreign or unknown entities attempting to access data (FAIL)
  2. Proper Password Protections – (FAIL: many share same password)
  3. Protect Voter/Cardholder Data – (FAIL: data dumps of private voter data)
  4. Encrypt Transmitted Data – N/A
  5. Use and Maintain Anti-Virus – on all devices that interact with net or data (FAIL: has malware)
  6. Properly Updated Software – Firewalls & anti-virus and patches for vulnerabilities (FAIL)
  7. Restrict Data Access – strictly “need to know” only (FAIL: many externals have access)
  8. Unique IDs for Access – creates less vulnerability, quicker response time (FAIL)
  9. Restrict Physical Access – secure locked locations, logs any access (FAIL: can access hardware or software)
  10. Create and Maintain Access Logs – use special software to log access & accuracy (FAIL: can alter logs)
  11. Scan and Test for Vulnerabilities – Done regularly (FAIL: years pass with same issues)
  12. Document All Your Policies – For flow, storage, access, etc.

In comparison, the ElectionsOnline HOA software uses online voting and PDF postal mail voting. They are compliant and follow all Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards for all their voting data, especially things through the net. They treat votes just as important as money. So the $800 HOA voting software is clearly more secure than the $800,000 government software. Think on that! (TGP)

Microsoft developed part of the program that was used to change votes and then licensed the software to not only Dominion, but essentially every other computerized voter machine operated tabulation system. In an official press release published by Microsoft on September 24, 2019, Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella announced the availability of “Election Guard”. A close examination of Microsofts “Defending Democracy” Program reveals that one of its core goals is “Defending against disinformation campaigns”.

“ElectionGuard is accessible by design and will make voting more secure, verifiable and efficient anywhere it’s used in the United States or in democratic nations around the world. Today we’re announcing that ElectionGuard is now available on GitHub so that major election technology suppliers can begin integrating ElectionGuard into their voting systems.

“As we’ve previously announced, all major manufacturers of voting systems in the United States are working with us to explore ways to incorporate ElectionGuard into their systems including Clear Ballot, Democracy Live, Election Systems & Software, Dominion Voting Systems, Hart InterCivic, BPro, MicroVote, Smartmatic and VotingWorks. We’ve worked deeply with many of these companies over the summer to prepare them for today’s SDK release.”

The ElectionGuard specification includes both “informal” and “formal” road maps for how ElectionGuard works. The informal spec is authored by Dr. Josh Benaloh of Microsoft Research and provides the conceptual and mathematical basis for end-to-end verifiable elections with ElectionGuard. The formal spec contains detailed guidance manufacturers will need to incorporate ElectionGuard into their systems, including a full description of the API – which is the way voting systems communicate with the ElectionGuard software – and the stages of an end-to-end verifiable election.

So in other words, through his “Defending Democracy” program, which was established in 2018, Bill Gates has infected the voting machinery across the country in an effort that would eventually eradicate in person voting and result in our future elections being carried out on the Internet.

A deeper dive reveals that Bill Gates and Microsoft have a vested interest in controlling Global voting systems because their push for electronic vote tabulation and virtual voting is parallel to their multi million dollar investment into COVID-19 research and their push for global COVID vaccinations.

In April, 2020, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced their commitment of $250 Million towards global COVID research and in August, 2020, Bill Gates said he was spending $150 Million to try to make a COVID-19 vaccine.

When Coronavirus was declared a global pandemic in March, 2020, the Democrats immediately began their vote by mail crusade and their attack on all in person political events, i.e Trump rallies. Billions of people around the world were ordered to lockdown and only communicate on social media and via the Internet. Lockdowns, COVID-19 restrictions, and mask mandates completely transformed the 2020 elections and opened up the discussion for “virtual elections’ and “online voting”.

We were told that due to COVID-19, it was too unsafe to vote in person at the polls and that for the sake of humanity, we should vote by mail. All opposition to mail in ballots and the threat of COVID-19 were met with heavy Internet censorship that was excused as “combatting Internet disinformation.”

Elections Supervisor Demonstrates How Dominion Software Allows Adding, Changing Votes

An elections supervisor in Coffee County, Georgia, demonstrated in recent videos posted online how Dominion Voting Systems voting software allows votes to be changed through an “adjudication” process. The process allows the operator to add vote marks to a scanned ballot as well as invalidate vote marks already on the ballot. The videos were posted by local news site Douglas Now, whose publisher, Robert Preston, told The Epoch Times they were filmed this week in the local election office.

The duplication process might explain why a polling manager in Fulton County testified that she encountered a box of ballots with a batch of 110 that were “pristine” and not folded. (Source)

How can Americans trust that their elections are free and fair if the election software being developed and placed on voting machines throughout the nation, and throughout the world, is being managed by mega rich Silicon Valley and Big Tech billionaires who also happen to be Democrat Party mega donors, or in the case of Dominion and Smartmatics, have ties to third world dictators like Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez? (via Loomered)

All of Dominion’s software engineers are currently (Nov 2020) located in Serbia. Sidney Powell was on Lou Dobbs to give information from an affadavit from a high ranking military officer who was present when Smartmatic (Dominion) was designed giving firsthand evidence that Smartmatic voting software was designed in a way to change the vote of a voter without being detected:

Prominent Attorney L. Lin Wood, who successfully represented teen Nicholas Sandmann in defamation suits against The Washington Post and CNN, joined the president’s efforts to win back the 2020 election and within a week implicated (1) several deep state players for treasonous crimes: Biden, Obama, and Hillary & Bill Clinton; (2) the fake news media: CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News, NY Times, Washington Post, Atlantic, Mother Jones, and the Chinese Communist Party via the Dominion Voting software etc. as co-conspirators for trying to steal the US election and overthrow the Constitution that empowers the people and protects their soverignty and liberties.

The State of Texas rejected Dominion in 2020 for use in its elections, writing:

The examiner reports identified multiple hardware and software issues that preclude the Office of the Texas Secretary of State from determining that the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system satisfies each of the voting-system requirements set forth in the Texas Election Code. Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns about whether the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system is suitable for its intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation. Therefore, the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system and corresponding hardware devices do not meet the standards for certification prescribed by Section 122.001 of the Texas Election Code.2

Dominion machine locations in orange

Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative wrote a major report that explored Dominion and other voting companies. The study noted difficulties in studying voting machines and companies, writing, “Part of the challenge in understanding the election technology industry is that it is difficult to compile even basic facts about it. The industry earns an estimated $300 million in revenue annually…The industry is dominated by three firms that are moderate in size and neither publicly nor independently held, limiting the amount of information available in the public domain about their operations and financial performance.”

The study continued, “The seller side of the election technology industry has come to be characterized by a consolidated, highly concentrated market dominated by a few major vendors, where industry growth and competition are constrained.” It says that Dominion acquired other companies to consolidate its position in the market. Dominion is orange in this Penn Wharton map (View Expanded).

The company told the Washington Times they had nothing to do with the problem.

Re Gwinnett – There is no evidence of any system software problem,” said Kay Stimson, Dominion Voting Systems vice president of government affairs, in an email. “My understanding is that the system was hanging at certain points in processing adjudicated ballots due to a workstation set-up issue. Our technicians worked with the county to address it, and election officials moved on to re-adjudicating ballots by the next day.

Although there have been assurances that voting machines are not connected to the Internet this isn’t the case per a report at NBC earlier this year, noting Dominion as one system that appears to be connected to the Internet:

The three largest voting manufacturing companies — Election Systems &Software, Dominion Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic — have acknowledged they all put modems in some of their tabulators and scanners. The reason? So that unofficial election results can more quickly be relayed to the public. Those modems connect to cell phone networks, which, in turn, are connected to the internet.

The Epoch Times reported that in Michigan’s Wayne County an observer can attest to the fact that the voting machines there were connected to the Internet:

Voting machines used in Michigan’s Wayne County appeared to have been connected to the internet, according to a sworn affidavit signed by a poll watcher.

At approximately 11 p.m. on Nov. 3, Patrick Colbeck observed an icon identifying an active internet connection on the screens of the computers used to tabulate and adjudicate ballots.8

In addition, the modems have been identified and proven to be Chinese owned via iHealth, a US subsidiary of Tianjin’s Andon Group.

Another feature of the Dominion software is a weighted race algorithm (exposed by election fraud watchdog Bev Harris as fractional magic) where votes can be assigned a fraction rather than a whole integer. For instance, Trump votes could be assigned a value of .8 and Biden votes 1.0 such that 20% of Trump votes would disappear.

In addition, the Dominion voting machines provided percentages only, not total amount of votes per candidate.

Functionality is also built into the Dominion voting machines that makes it possible to create votes. “Fake stacks” of ballots can be easily generated AUTOMATICALLY by the Dominion Voting software as noted in its own user manual.

Dominion Voting Systems Officer of Strategy and Security Eric Coomer, an unhinged sociopath, admitted in 2016 that vendors and Election Officials have access to manipulate the vote and in a 2017 video explaining how to alter votes. An avid anti-Trumper, Coomer participated in ANTIFA chats according to patriot infiltrator of Antifa, Joe Oltman. Oltman said an a chat, responding to a question regarding “if F*cking Trump wins“. Coomer said (paraphrased): Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!” As information came out about Dominion, over 100 employees (out of 243 total) deleted their LinkedIn accounts. He’s caught in video explaining to election officials on how to switch votes and again here.


MI Senate Oversight Committee questioned Dominion CEO John Poulos about the Dominion Voting machines used in Michigan in the November election. During his testimony, Mr. Poulos was asked specifically about Antrim County voting machines where it was discovered that thousands of votes flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden in the solidly red county. The media and Mr. Poulos blamed the incredible exchange of votes on “human error.” But, Poulos was proven a liar by the forensic audit in MI.

President Trump retweeted a Glenn Beck video where an expert on the Dominion voting machines talked about the ability for these machines to be able to change a vote after it was entered into the machine:

Their software was responsible for a ‘glitch’ in in Antrim County, MI which caused 6,000 Republican votes to be counted as Democrat, according to Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox. Also, Politico reported that election machines from Dominion in two Republican counties (one went 70% Trump and the other 60%) were down for 2 hours. Dominion’s software ‘glitched’ to switch 6000 Trump votes to Biden in in at least one MI county. Another ‘glitch’ during the 2020 Election led election officials in Oakland County, MI to hand an upset victory to a Democrat, only to switch the win back to an incumbent Republican a day later. A third so called glitch, six days after the election,  was caught when 19,958 votes were subtracted from President Trump and added to Joe Biden, a nearly 40,000 vote swing,  live on CNN.

Following an audit of a machine used in Antrim County, it was determined by the forensic team of 7 that:

  • “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations Group, said in the report.
  • “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication,” he added.  The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.”

What is typically a fraction of a percent for errors, was 68.05% in Antrim County and Clark County in Nevada kicked out about 70% in errors to be adjucated. It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity because it provides no meaningful observation of the adjudication process or audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicated the ballots. The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error. Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing.

There was also another instance caught live where the total number of votes counted were decreased by 373,000 in Virginia, another location where Dominion Voting machines are in place.

This is the information the company gives about its work in some key battleground states that were helping determine the presidential election:2

  • Michigan: “Ranked the #1 system by a state review panel in 2018, 65 of 83 counties have chosen Democracy Suite.”
  • Georgia: “2020 statewide voting system rollout, with 33,000 ImageCast X BMDs, serving 159 counties.”
  • Arizona: “Serving 2.2 million Maricopa County voters with Democracy Suite 5.5 paired with the ImageCast X, ImageCast Precinct, and ImageCast Central.”
  • Nevada: “Designed for its Clark County debut in 2017, the ImageCast X with VVPAT now supports 16 of 17 Counties.”

South Carolina implemented machines right before the South Carolina Democrat primary where Biden won his first primary ever after multiple attempts at the Presidency.  A local ABC news channel reported in February 2020 on the transition to the Dominion voting machines:

But instead of choosing simple, hand-marked paper ballots that are most resistant to tampering because paper cannot be hacked, many are opting for pricier technology that computer security experts consider almost as risky as earlier discredited electronic systems…

…The most pricey solution available, they are at least twice as expensive as the hand-marked paper ballot option. They have been vigorously promoted by the three voting equipment vendors that control 88 percent of the U.S. market.

Some of the most popular ballot-marking machines, made by industry leaders Election Systems & Software and Dominion Voting Systems, register votes in bar codes that the human eye cannot decipher. That’s a problem, researchers say: Voters could end up with printouts that accurately spell out the names of the candidates they picked, but, because of a hack, the bar codes do not reflect those choices. Because the bar codes are what’s tabulated, voters would never know that their ballots benefited another candidate.

Even on machines that do not use bar codes, voters may not notice if a hack or programming error mangled their choices. A University of Michigan study determined that only 7 percent of participants in a mock election notified poll workers when the names on their printed receipts did not match the candidates they voted for.

MSNBC reported in 2019 how easy it is to hack into Dominion and ES&S voting machines.

Judge Them by the Company they Keep

Adding to the intrigue, Dominion Voting Systems has apparent ties to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat. Bloomberg reported in April of last year that Dominion Voting Systems — which commands more than a third of the voting-machine market without having Washington lobbyists — has hired its first, a high-powered firm that includes a longtime aide to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. They hired Brownstein Farber Hyatt & Schreck. Nadeam Elshami, Pelosi’s former chief of staff, is one of the lobbyists on the account.

Also Democrat Feinstein’s husband does have a major stake in Dominion – 60%:

However, it may only be 28 states according to their own website, as reported by Breitbart:

Dominion Voting Systems boasts on its website of having “customers in 28 states,” including “9 of the top 20 counties” and “4 of the top 10 counties” throughout the United States.

Dominion also has ties to the corrupt Clinton Foundation via the Clinton Global Initiative’s DELIAN Project. The Clinton Foundation website says that:

In 2014, Dominion Voting committed to providing emerging and post-conflict democracies with access to voting technology through its philanthropic support to the DELIAN Project, as many emerging democracies suffer from post-electoral violence due to the delay in the publishing of election results. Over the next three years, Dominion Voting will support election technology pilots with donated Automated Voting Machines (AVM), providing an improved electoral process, and therefore safer elections. As a large number of election staff are women, there will be an emphasis on training women, who will be the first to benefit from the skills transfer training and use of AVMs. It is estimated that 100 women will directly benefit from election technology skills training per pilot election.

Further, in 2015 Washington Post reported that Dominion Voting Systems donated between $25,001 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation. If anyone believes that “technology pilots” working for the Clinton Foundation who are donated Dominion’s voting machines are making our elections safer, then please call me. I have oceanfront property available in Arizona that I’d love to sell you. These “pilots” are no safer than the terrorist pilots on 9/11!

Increasing the scrutiny, it has also worked with firms tied to George Soros and Robert Mueller and gets some components from China. A former ambassador named by former President Barack Obama sits on the board of a company that acquired it in 2018. An executive board member of Staple Street Capital, William Earl Kennard, is a former ambassador to the EU who was appointed to that position by former President Barack Obama. In 2018, Dominion announced it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital. On November 6, Kennard was named to the board of WarnerMedia parent AT&T, which owns CNN.

The New York Times reported in June 2020 on issues in the Georgia primary. Dominion’s spokesperson said the company had to replace 20 components for 30,000 machines in the Georgia primary calling it a “lower number for a statewide voting system rollout across 159 counties.” The Times reported that some Democrats in the Georgia Legislature opposed purchasing the system but there is “some evidence that heavy lobbying and sales tactics have played a role in their adoption in Georgia and elsewhere.” Georgia alone has eight registered lobbyists for Dominion, and they include Lewit Abit Massey, a former Democratic Georgia Secretary of State and Jared Thomas, former chief of staff for Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, according to The Times.

According to 100% Fed Up, Dominion won Georgia’s $107 million elections contract this summer because it was the lowest bidder — not the best, according to score sheets from six state evaluators. The nation’s largest elections company and the state’s existing provider, Election Systems & Software, received the highest technical score but lost the contract because of its $143 million price tag.

The company also has been involved in elections overseas, and one in the Philippines was controversial. According to Access Wire, “Dominion entered into a 2009 contract with Smartmatic and provided Smartmatic with the PCOS machines (optical scanners) that were used in the 2010 Philippine election, the biggest automated election run by a private company.” Problems arose with source codes, according to ABS CBN News. One issue unearthed: “Commands to add, update and delete existing database records lack enclosing transaction logic which may affect database contents and may possibly result in database integrity and other corruption issues.”

Center Square noted:

Smartmatic’s chairman is a member of the British House of Lords, Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, former vice-president at the World Bank, lead international partner at Sawyer Miller, a political consulting firm, and former vice-chair of the World Economic Forum.

This is beyond suspicious. With reports of “The Hammer” and “Scorecard” being used to steal the election, additional attention needs to be put on Dominion Voting Systems.

An analysis of data that has was passed around reportedly captured by the New York Times on election night, was performed on the entire data set, starting with the states where Dominion voting machines were used. The author claims that the data is from Edison Research and it is the same data that is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN, NBC News, as well as the NY Times website among others.

Here are the (unaudited) results by state:

The Chart Lists Votes Switched from Trump to Biden and Votes That Were Lost by Trump

Switched VotesLost Votes
Dominion Systems
New Jersey80,24220
New York18,124623,213
New Hampshire973116
New Mexico2684,610
Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, Owned by Dominion
Election Systems & Software
South Carolina2,7792,119
South Dakota1,3471
North Dakota234681
North Carolina015
District of Columbia00
Unknown Systems
Rhode Island613
West Virginia078,300
OVERALL TOTALS512,0952,865,757

Based on this initial analysis over 500,000 votes were identified that were switched from President Trump to Joe Biden

In addition to this another 2,865,757 votes were deleted.

2020 Election Dominion Voting Systems Whistleblowers come forward:

Dominion Voting Systems backed out of testifying before a Pennsylvania House Committee following the election.

Another individual, John Brakey who is co-founder and Director of Audit USA, warned about the Dominion voting machines before the election. In March he and a reporter were not allowed access to the election management system (EMS) in Michigan during the primary there.  In Michigan Dominion voting machines are used.  Brakey said, “It felt like they were hiding the EMS from the public and us”.

Brakey also said this about the Dominion voting machines in the past:

It’s the optical scanners where the largest chance of cheating occurs.”

An IT specialist by the name of Ron@CodeMonkeyZ unloaded a series of tweets identifying major control weaknesses within the Dominion voting machine environment. Gateway Pundit has an article. More here from an additional IT expert and V-cards used in Pennsylvania according to the Trump team lawsuit there.

It’s also reported that former Dominion programmers are talking to the Trump team about what they know about the machines as well as the entire code base has been turned over.

Sequoia Voting Systems

After Smartmatic was sold to Sequoia, Sequoia was sold to Dominion in 2007 after a major election fraud controversy in Venezuela. Following the 2004 Venezuelan recall election, Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems, from the British company De La Rue in 2005. De la Rue was the official Crown Agent of the British Empire who still prints banknotes for the Bank of England. Crown Agents ran the day-today affairs of the Empire.

De La Rue is banned and blacklisted in India for supplying substandard paper for printing Indian currency notes and also for its involvement in the Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICN) with Pakistan, posing a threat to India. De La Rue’s role in printing Indian currency notes was exposed by GreatGameIndia in 2016 which became a major scandal in India.

Documents in possession of GreatGameIndia also revealed an insidious conspiracy by these companies to smuggle biometric and demographic data of Indians collected during a Pilot Project initiated under National Population Register to Taiwan. Such sensitive data in the wrong hands in a foreign country could not just result in identity theft but pose a threat to India’s National Security since the same companies are also manufacturers of election voting machines.

Democrat leaders, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (MA), Amy Klobuchar (MN), and Ron Wyden (OR), wrote a letter in December 2019 to the private equity firms controlling the United States’ three leading election technology companies, expressing concern about the election technology industry’s “vulnerabilities” and “lack of transparency.”

Smartmatic posted a tweet a couple od weeks after the 2020 election outright denying their transfer of technology to Dominion voting systems, but the evidence points to a cover up. Smartmatic published a press release announcing their sale Sequoia voting systems. Dominion voting systems also sent out a press release announcing their purchase of a Intellectual properties, Hardware and Software that was once owned by Smartmatic. Dominion and Smartmatic have both tried to erase their ties by deleting the original press release from their websites.

Many publications linked in Wikipedia articles for Sequoia voting and Smartmatic are now erased from the internet, but you can still use to view them as they were when they posted the article. Many articles correlate this, many mainstream news articles also addressed Dominion purchasing Sequoia although never naming Smartmatic as the parent company owner of Sequoia. Other websites that also correlate Smartmatic and Dominion transferring technology include The Gateway Pundit has a full article on the cover up here…

Missouri state lawmaker Justin Hill (R-Lake St. Louis) released a bombshell report on Dominion Voting Systems on 1 Dec 2020. According to Hill Dominion were dissolved last year for failure to pay income taxes while operating in the state of Missouri, thus Dominion has been operating illegally in the state.

Rep. Justin Hill told The Gateway Pundit that Dominion currently has about 20% of the electorate in the state of Missouri. Hill also found out that Dominion was dissolved in the State of Missouri. According to Missouri state law they are not allowed to operate their business in the Show Me state except for winding down their activities.

Rep. Hill told Gateway Pundit what is really interesting is that through his research he found that the source code from Dominion should be turned over to the state after the company dissolved in the state. Hill promised to keep us abreast on his findings.1

The Trump Team prepared a report on Dominion Systems to give to State Legislatures. The report has several bombshells, they include:

  • In a sworn affidavit, a former high-ranking Venezuelan Military Officer states that the Smartmatic software was designed so that votes could be changed without being detected, and was set up so that there would be no public evidence of tampering with votes
  • Dominion is also tied to the Clinton Foundation, as well as several state-run Venezuelan software and telecommunications companies, which had been involved with rigging elections for authoritarian leaders, like Hugo Chavez, and Nicolas Maduro
  • In 2014, Lord Malloch Brown became the chairman of the board of SGO Corporation Limited, a holding company based in London whose primary asset is Smartmatic electronic voting machine technology. Lord Malloch-Brown is a member of the British House of Lords, and a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, and former vice-president at the World Bank.
  • Dominion voting machine components are made in China, subject to possible manipulation.
  • Dominion’s instruction manual explains how votes can be wiped away in an instant, with the capability of “dragging and dropping” votes to a separate folder, then deleting that folder entirely.
  • Brian Mechler, who conducted an inspection of Dominion electronic voting machines for the Secretary of State of Texas in 2019, said in an affidavit that the Dominion systems are so outdated that they are not even supported by Google from a security standpoint. For this reason, the affiant cites that it is unclear how Dominion could have met its obligations to maintain adequate security practices, or secure any faith in this system or its results.



A controversy that refers to several scandals during President Barack Obama tenure, notably the misuse of government agencies, media manipulation, illegal wiretaping, and domestic spying on American citizens to harass political opponents and critics. By the election year of 2016, Obama officials vastly expanded the use of the foreign intelligence gathering apparatus as a weapon against domestic political opponents. In 2013, there were 9,600 FISA search queries involving 195 Americans. But in 2016, there are 30,355 searches of 5,288 Americans.

With the release of DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s first installment report, it became abundantly clear the Obama intelligence community attempted to whitewash crimes Hillary Clinton was accused of and to meddle in the outcome of America’s democratic processes.

Some have drawn parallels between Obamagate and the Watergate scandal of the 1970s; the FISA courts were created as a post-Watergate reform. Had the Watergate burglars been granted outside contractor access to the FISA database, it would make a closer comparison. In Watergate, Nixon turned to outside contractors, the Plumbers unit, after the FBI refused Nixon’s request to spy on political opponents; in Obamagate the FBI colluded with outside contractors, FusionGPS, to spy on Obama and DNC opponents. In Watergate, the CIA declined Nixon’s request to help cover up the crime by deceiving FBI investigators; in Obamagate, the CIA director masterminded the crime in collusion with the FBI and Department of Justice.1

2015 The Progressive Police State

What Nixon contemplated – misuse of the FBI and CIA against domestic opponents – but failed to accomplish yet was nevertheless forced from office, Obama achieved beyond anyone’s wildest expectations. The post-Watergate reform Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to supervise Executive Branch power was systematically and wantonly circumvented to harass political opponents in an attempt to dictate the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, and blackmail the winner with illegally gathered evidence should the Obama coterie of conspirators fail.

Obamagate timeline 2015 – the progressive police state documents how the Leftist authoritarian utopia under President Barack Obama was firmly in place to cover-up the crimes of Hillary Rodham Clinton, compromise whomever the 2016 GOP nominee would be, and rig the 2016 election for Hillary Clinton. This assault on American democracy is indisputable.

The origins of intelligence lures, FBI provocateurs or Spygate. Sally Yates terminates independent Inspector General oversight of the DOJ-National Security Division. Nellie Ohr hired as an FBI contractor to begin illegal FISA 702 surveillance on Michael Cohen and others. Papadopoulos set up.

Comey gives immunity to Clinton cronies who destroyed evidence under Congressional subpoena.

During a period of November 2015 through April 18, 2016, Justice Department political insiders and outside political contractors, including FusionGPS, accessed the NSA and FBI database using FISA-702(17) “About Queries”. They gathered information on political opposition of candidate Hillary Clinton, including Donald Trump campaign officials and affiliates. NSA Director Mike Rogers suspected illegal abuse and instructed the NSA compliance officer to conduct a full FISA audit. The NSA began querying DOJ and FBI activity.

The unlawfully obtained FISA intelligence information ended up with Fusion GPS. The key personnel in FusionGPS are husband and wife Glenn Simpson and Mary Jacoby. Mary Jacoby’s relationship with the Clintons’ goes back to the Rose Law Firm.

January 2016

CIA operative Eric Ciaramella, working in the White House, requested Ukrainian officials to re-open an investigation into Paul Manafort which the FBI had dismissed in 2014. The FBI under James Comey re-opened the investigation at the same time Ciaramella met with Ukrainian officials in the White House. Ciaramella later became the Adam Schiff’s alleged “whistleblower” in the Trump impeachment inquiry after the failure of Special Counsel Robert Mueller to produce sufficient evidence to remove President Trump from office in 2019.

  • 4 January. John Podesta emails Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, “Look forward to working with you to elect the first woman President of the United States,” Sandberg replies she was “thrilled” by the progress that Clinton was making.
  • 7 January. NSA Inspector General, George Ellard, released a report on NSA Controls & FISA compliance:

    “We identified another [redacted] queries that were performed outside the targeting authorization periods in [Executive Order] 12333 data, which is prohibited by the E.O. 12333 minimization procedures. We also identified queries performed using [United States Persons] selectors [phone numbers, emails] in [FISA Amendments Act of 2008] §702 upstream data, which is prohibited by the FAA §702 minimization procedures.”

    Material FISA abuses were routinely taking place. Following IG Ellard’s report, Adm. Mike Rogers implemented a tightening of internal rules at the NSA. By law, John Carlin of the DOJ-NSD should have informed the FISA court immediately of the results of the IG’s Report, but the court was not informed until NSA Dir. Adm. Mike Rogers personally told the court on October 23, 2016, two days after the Obama DOJ hoaxed the FISA court into granting FISA Title I authority over Carter Page, which then extended throughout the Trump transition well into the first year of Trump’s presidency.

  • 12 January. Christopher Steele emails Bruce Ohr:

    “I heard from Adam WALDMAN [a Deripaska lawyer/lobbyist] yesterday that OD [ Oleg Deripaska ] is applying for another official US visa ice [sic] APEC [Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation] business at the end of February.”

    Steele said Deripaska was being “encouraged by the Agency guys who told Adam [Waldman] that the USG [United States Government stance on [Deripaska] is softening.” Steele concluded: “A positive development it seems.” Steele also asked Ohr when he might be coming to London, or somewhere in Europe, “as I would be keen to meet up here and talk business.” Ohr replied warmly the same day and said he would likely travel to Europe, but not the U.K., at least twice in February.

Read more at Conservapedia…

Obama Riots

Sometimes referred to as the Obama War on Police, were a series of racially motivated conflagrations that erupted nationwide particulalry in the last half of President Barack Obama’s second term. Initially elected as America’s first “post-racial” president, many African-Americans became increasingly disillusioned as Obama’s presidency progressed. Critics charged Obama personally inflamed the rioters and lawless elements responsible for the destruction of property, businesses, and jobs in several American cities. The Obama administration either deliberately to further Marxist revolution or indirectly through subterfuge and naivete destroyed decades of improvement in race relations in the United States.

Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen noted early on in the Wall Street Journal, “Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.” Mary Frances Berry, former head of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, acknowledged that the Obama administration attempted to polarize America around the issue of race as a way of diverting attention from an anemic recovery and other issues. Caddell and Schoen further stated, “President Obama’s divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture.

There were at least 5 Obama riots: Oscar Grant Riots, Trayvon Martin Violence, Manuel Diaz Violence, Kimini Gray Riots, and the Baltimore riots. Additionally, 5 Dallas policemen and 3 Baton Rouge policemen were murdered during Obama’s open season on police.

Read More…