Airport body scanners

Every day travelers are herded through the checkpoint corrals into one of these anti-terrorism full body scanners at airports and other places in the name of ‘security’ thanks to 9/11 followed by the 2009 FBI underwear bomber false flag. First, the TSA told us those X-ray scanners (that showed way too many naked body parts) were perfectly safe. Even the manufacturer of the device, Rapidscan, openly admitted the scanners had not been adequately tested. The truth was later revealed that the safety tests turned out to be totally rigged, as reported by Natural News.

Health Risks

When they were first rolled out post-911, backscatter X-ray tunnels quickly became standard fare at commercial aviation facilities nationwide. The TSA claimed the amount of low-intensity radiation emitted by these machines was safe, releasing less than 10 microREMs of radiation per screening. This is an amount equivalent to what an airplane passenger might incur after just two or three minutes of flying at cruising altitude.

This claim was later debunked. It was revealed that concentrated radiation blasted directly at a person’s body is much more harmful than the random patterns of ionizing radiation sent in all directions from the cosmos and by an airplane’s navigational equipment during flight. Not long after these facts came to light, the TSA came up with a different type of screening technology that it said was safer − the millimeter wave machine.

According to the TSA’s Frequently Asked Questions page, millimeter wave imaging technology “uses harmless electromagnetic waves to detect potential threats, which are highlighted on a generic outline of a person appearing on a monitor attached to the unit. If no anomalies are detected, an ‘OK’ appears on the screen with no outline.”

It all seems simple enough, right? Unfortunately, this explanation by the TSA is trite at best, and deliberately misleading at worst. A closer look into millimeter wave technology and the ways in which it affects the human body during an average TSA screening reveals a truth that the government doesn’t want you to know. The doses of electromagnetic radiation emitted by the TSA’s millimeter wave technology machines can cause cancer.

The fact that millimeter wave technology is used in the treatment of skin cancer (due to its known skin-heating properties), means it undeniably has an effect on human cells. This heating is a direct result of microwave frequencies entering the skin and inducing a certain level of atomic motion within the cellular structure. This is really just a fancy way of saying that millimeter wave radiation microwaves your skin.

Just how much this millimeter wave radiation microwaves your skin is where push comes to shove. But most scientists are in agreement that any amount of radiation poses at least some level of risk. The public deserves to know both this level of risk and what they can do to minimize or eliminate it.

Though not ionizing in nature, millimeter wave radiation is still potentially damaging to the human body. A 2012 paper published in the journal Radiation Research admits that the safety of millimeter wave body scanners is “difficult-to-impossible to prove using publicly accessible data.” This means that TSA claims of negligible risk associated with their use represent the opinion of the TSA, and not scientific fact.

What we do know is that millimeter waves, which exist in the 30-300 GHz range, cause “multiple biological effects,” according to another study published the same year in the International Journal of Oncology. Though this study looked specifically at millimeter wave radiation in the context of cancer treatment, the morphological effects demonstrated reveal that this supposedly “safe” form of radiation causes cellular change that inhibit cellular growth.

Like all other forms of radiation, millimeter waves don’t differentiate between healthy cells and malignant cells. Whatever cells they’re targeted at are the cells they destroy. In the case of concentrated radiation blasts from millimeter wave body scanners, it means every cell on the surface of your body.

What this all means is that millimeter wave body scanners act as giant microwaves that literally heat travelers’ bodies at the cellular level using ultra-high frequencies not normally found in nature. Microwave ovens operate at nearly the same frequencies as these machines. They induce cellular vibrations strong enough to generate heat in food, so imagine what it’s doing to your skin.

But these are just minor thermal effects, you might be thinking, since an airport body scan only lasts a mere two seconds or so as opposed to 30 seconds to a minute to warm a bowl of soup in a microwave oven. But the principle is still the same, especially when taking into account repeated exposures.

And you also have to consider the non-thermal effects of millimeter wave radiation, which disrupt cellular communication in ways that science has yet to fully delineate. The United States Air Force conducted its own research into ultra-high frequency, non-ionizing radiation as a potential weapons technology. Interestingly, in the process they uncovered evidence that the non-thermal activity of millimeter wave radiation directly interferes with the body’s ability to protect and heal itself.

A World Health Organization (WHO) report adds even more to the conversation, revealing that millimeter waves not only heat the skin but also damage eyesight and cause cancer, particularly cancer of the skin.

A team of researchers from the Center for Nonlinear Studies at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico recognized the lack of scientific research into this questionable technology. They decided to investigate for themselves how high-frequency terahertz (THz) waves, like the kind emitted from the TSA’s millimeter wave full body scanners, affect human DNA. They learned that:

“THz waves … unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication.”

Recognizing these inherent dangers, the best thing air travelers can do is opt out of the TSA screening process when presented with a body scanner rather than a traditional metal detector. By choosing a manual pat-down, air travelers can minimize their radiation exposure and thus minimize the risk of developing cancer.

Though physically invasive and admittedly unconstitutional, a physical pat-down is still better than being blasted with a concentrated vortex of electrical and magnetic energy. As it sweeps around your body, the full body scanner exposes each square centimeter of your body to about 0.013 milliwatts of radiation. Collectively, this is enough to induce gene mutations, nerve damage, sterility, and even cancer.

“Low levels (below 10 mW/cm2) of NIR (non-ionizing radiation) have been found to produce many adverse health effects in animals including temporary sterility, genetic changes, and changes in the transmission of nerve impulses,” explains the Foundation for Advancement in Cancer Therapy (FACT).

“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has found preliminary evidence that these low levels may affect the immune system, which means the body may be less able to fight off disease.”


The scanners offer detailed pictures of what a person looks like under their clothes, including the sex of the person. The system requires the person viewing the image to be in a separate room so that they never see the person in question. The person’s face is also blanked out on the screen. Scanner manufacturers had more than doubled their lobbying spend leading up to the Christmas Day false flag by the underwear bomber and the CIA. L-3 Communications, for instance, spent over 4 million on lobbying in the five years prior. reports:

Within days or even hours of the bombing attempt, everyone was talking about so-called whole-body imaging as the magic bullet that could stop this type of attack. In announcing hearings by the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Joe Lieberman approached the use of scanners as a foregone conclusion, saying one of the “big, urgent questions that we are holding this hearing to answer” was “Why isn’t whole-body-scanning technology that can detect explosives in wider use?” Former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff told the Washington Post, “You’ve got to find some way of detecting things in parts of the body that aren’t easy to get at. It’s either pat downs or imaging, or otherwise hoping that bad guys haven’t figured it out, and I guess bad guys have figured it out.” Chertoff was a heavy lobbyist for the scanners. Each interview he was introduced like above, as the former chief of Homeland Security. No mention was made of the company he started in 2009, The Chertoff Group, a consulting firm for the very manufacturers of the body scanners he stood to profit from.

Linda Daschle, a former official at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and wife of former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, is also a paid lobbyist at L-3 Communications. She recently worked hard to defeat a bill proposed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) that would have limited scanner use at airports. (Natural News)

Since the alternative to scanners is being groped by airport screeners, the scanners might sound pretty good. The Transportation Security Administration claimed that the images “are friendly enough to post in a preschool,” though the pictures themselves tell another story, and numerous organizations have opposed them as a gross invasion of privacy. Beyond privacy issues, however, are questions about whether these machines even really work — and about who stood to benefit most from their use.

Both shoe and underwear bomber attempted to use PETN (a military explosive) on their respective flights. As a result, our shoes now go through scanners at airports and I can only presume that more invasive scanning of our lower torsos will also be mandated supposedly in an effort to prevent further underwear attacks. The problem, however, is this:

PETN, either in shoes or strapped to any part of the body, cannot be detected by airport scanners. A chemical test is needed. Unless authorities plan to drastically reconfigure the number and availability of international flights, there is no chance that chemical tests can be introduced for every passenger. Hence we reach our first tentative conclusion: that the billions of shoes that have been scanned at airports since 2001, and the billions of pairs of underwear that will henceforth become objects of official scrutiny, have and will have had nothing to do with airport security or preventing terrorism.

Next Generation Scanners

Airport scanners used by the Transportation Security Administration are already too revealing, and potentially very dangerous to your health. But they’re going to seem tame by comparison once the next generation of scanners arrives – and they are on their way. The U.S. government is developing what are called Picosecond Programmable Laser scanners, through the Department of Homeland Security – machines that will be capable of scanning every single molecule in your body. What’s worse, especially in terms of privacy, travelers likely won’t even know they’re being watched, since the machine can be operated from distances in excess of 150 feet, according to reports.

The scanner, which Homeland Security officials believe could be ready to use within a few years, will be employed in airports, but it is going to be small and light enough to be very portable, meaning it could also be installed in any building or deployed along any street. It is reportedly 10 million times faster and a million times more sensitive that scanners currently used by the TSA and U.S. Border Patrol and customs agents at border crossings and ports of entry.

According to a report by, the government subcontracted with the CIA’s venture capital/technology acquisition branch, In-Q-Tel, to work on development of the device with Genia Photonics, a company that has acquired 30 patents relating to the molecular-level scanners. According to the Genia, the scanner is able to “penetrate clothing and many other organic materials and officers spectroscopic information, especially for materials that impact safety such as explosives and pharmacological substances.”

The technology isn’t new, per se, it’s just millions of times faster than ever. Back in 2008, a team at George Washington University built a similar laser spectrometer but just used a different process. That machine was able to sense drug metabolites in urine in under a second, trace the amount of gunpowder residue on a dollar bill and even certain chemical changers that were taking place in a plant leaf.

Russia has developed similar technology; scientists there announced in April that their “laser sensor can pick up a single molecule in a million from up to 50 meters away.” In-Q-Tel notes that “an important benefit of Genia Photonics’ implementation as compared to existing solutions is that the entire synchronized laser system is comprised in a single, robust and alignment-free unit that may be easily transported for use in many environments… This compact and robust laser has the ability to rapidly sweep wavelengths in any pattern and sequence.”

This device can literally – and likely will – be used everywhere by the Leviathan and its many domestic “law enforcement” agencies, so they can invade your privacy at will. As is usually the case in recent years regarding the development and use of sophisticated surveillance technology, there has been little governmental or legal debate on the mind-blowing implications to personal privacy; what are the limits to such technology? What privacy rights can Americans continue to expect – and receive – while in public? What’s to stop law enforcement from utilizing this kind of technology improperly?

As Gizmodo points out, what sort of molecular tags will authorities be searching for and who gets to decide?

“If you unknowingly stepped on the butt of someone’s joint and are carrying a sugar-sized grain of cannabis like [an] unfortunate traveler currently in jail in Dubai, will you be arrested?” the website asked. “And, since it’s extremely portable, will this technology extend beyond the airport or border crossings and into police cars, with officers looking for people on the street with increased levels of adrenaline in their system to detain in order to prevent potential violent outbursts? And will your car be scanned at stoplights for any trace amounts of suspicious substances? Would all this information be recorded anywhere?”


Chronological history of events related to Airport body scanners:

Christmas Underwear Bomber a False Flag? Full Body Scans in Airports Follow

Christmas Underwear Bomber a False Flag? Full Body Scans in Airports Follow

On May 7, AP headlined “US: CIA thwarts new al-Qaida underwear bomb plot,” saying: Agents foiled “an ambitious plot by al-Qaida’s affiliate in Yemen to destroy a US-bound airliner using a bomb with a sophisticated new design around the one-year anniversary of the killing of Osama bin Laden, The Associated Press has learned.” AP described an upgraded underwear bomb plot. Like the earlier one, it was ...
Read More
The Department of Homeland Security is Established

The Department of Homeland Security is Established

In 1998, Bill Clinton tasked former Senators Gary Hart and Warren Rudman to chair the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. The commission panel has been described as "a cross-section of the military-industrial-media complex". Its members included Leslie Gelb, editor of the New York Times, Norman Augustine, former CEO of Lockheed-Martin and US Army General John Galvin. The panel's report in January 2001 declared that it ...
Read More

Electromagnetic Fields

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, EMFs are “invisible areas of energy, often referred to as radiation, that are associated with the use of electrical power.1 Ionizing radiation is generally believed to have enough energy to break the covalent bonds in DNA but actually most of the damage is due to the oxidative stress resulting in excessive free radicals. The type of EMF your cellphone emits is in the microwave 2 to 5 gigahertz range. Besides your cellphone, electronics such as baby monitors, Bluetooth devices, cordless phones, smart thermostats and Wi-Fi routers consistently emit microwave radiation at levels that may damage your mitochondria.

The new 5G cell network uses high-band radio frequency millimeter waves to deliver high bandwidth data to any device within line of sight.

Today’s cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves – a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data. However, 5G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation. [Source]

One of the ways 5G will enable this is by tapping into new, unused bands at the top of the radio spectrum. These high bands are known as millimeter waves (mmwaves), and have been recently been opened up by regulators for licensing. They’ve largely been untouched by the public, since the equipment required to use them effectively has typically been expensive and inaccessible. [Source]

Among the many potential problems with exposure to 5G radio waves are issues with the skin, which is interesting when you consider that this technology is already being used in the military for crowd control purposes.

This kind of technology, which is in many of our homes, actually interacts with human skin and eyes. The shocking finding was made public via Israeli research studies that were presented at an international conference on the subject last year. Below you can find a lecture from Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics at Hebrew University. He goes through how human sweat ducts act like a number of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths that are put out by the devices that employ 5G technology. [Source]

The U.S. military developed a non-lethal crowd control weapon system called the Active Denial System (ADS). It uses radio frequency millimeter waves in the 95GHz range to penetrate the top 1/64 of an inch layer of skin on the targeted individual, instantly producing an intolerable heating sensation that causes them to flee.

This technology is becoming ubiquitous in top world militaries, demonstrating how genuinely effective this radio frequency energy can be at causing harm to humans and anything else.

U.S., Russian, and Chinese defense agencies have been active in developing weapons that rely on the capability of this electromagnetic technology to create burning sensations on the skin, for crowd control. The waves are Millimetre waves, also used by the U.S. Army in crowd dispersal guns called Active Denial Systems. [Source]

The fight over 5G is heating up at the community level, and awareness of this important issue is spreading fast. For more background on 5G, watch this video from Take Back Your Power, featuring Tom Wheeler, Former FCC Chairman and corporate lobbyist, who delivers a rather intimidating and presumptuous speech praising this new technology. The fight over 5G is heating up at the community level, though, and now is the time to speak out against it.

The negative effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) continue to ignite conversations and controversy worldwide. The most dangerous pollution affecting you is the invisible sea of EMFs your body swims in daily. You are exposed to EMFs all day long, not only in public but inside your home, too. Most of the radiation emits from cellphones, cell towers, computers, smart meters and Wi-Fi, to name just a few of the culprits.

While it’s nearly impossible to avoid EMF exposure completely, there are practical ways to limit it. Given the number of EMFs that bombard you all day long, getting educated about the negative effects of EMFs is imperative to your well-being. Particularly if you are dealing with a serious illness, it is well worth your time to reduce your EMF exposure as much as possible. If you have been told EMFs are safe and not a danger to humans, you may want to consider:

  • The telecommunication industry has manipulated federal regulatory agencies, public health authorities and professionals through powerful and sophisticated lobbying efforts leaving consumers confused and unaware of the health risks associated with EMFs
  • Any negative health effects from EMFs, similar to smoking, may not be immediately noticeable, but will likely develop gradually over time. Cell phones indeed are the cigarette public health threat of the 21st century.

Most agree on the hazards associated with ionizing radiation, which is why the dental hygienist covers you with a lead apron when taking X-rays. Similarly, you would expect to get sunburned if your bare skin is overexposed to the sun’s powerful UV rays. A number of studies show double and single strand DNA breaks are actually higher when exposed to nonionizing microwave radiation than ionizing radiation. This is believed to be due to the excessive oxidative stress that microwave exposure induces.

The industry says there’s not enough energy in microwave radiation to cause direct damage to covalent bonds in DNA. This is true. There isn’t. It’s the biological amplification resulting in excessive oxidative stress that causes the damage. Interestingly, even most of the damage caused by ionizing radiation is actually due to secondary free radical formation that breaks DNA. It’s not directly from the energy within the radiation. Pall explains:

“That was published by Arthur Compton. He got the Nobel Prize for it in 1927. The way in which ionizing radiation works, it basically gets molecules and atoms and knocks electrons out, and then you get pairs of free radicals generated. That’s called Compton scattering.

There is amplification from ionizing radiation, but it’s only at one level. One energetic photon can produce a chain of free radicals. You’ve got three levels of amplification with the microwave frequency EMFs. The amount of damage you get based on those studies is truly extraordinary. Of course, Adlkofer and [Pilger] Rudinger were severely attacked by the industry.”

Martin Pall, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University, has identified and published several papers describing the molecular mechanisms of how EMFs from cellphones and wireless technologies damage humans, animals and plants.2,3,4,5,6 Many studies indicate your intracellular calcium increases with exposure to EMFs.

Pall also discovered a number of studies showing that you can block or greatly reduce the effects of EMFs using calcium channel blockers — medication commonly prescribed to patients with heart disease. Notably, it is the excess calcium in the cell and increased calcium signaling that are responsible for a vast majority of the biological effects of EMFs.

Pall discovered no less than 26 bodies of research asserting that EMFs work by activating voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), which are located in the outer membrane of your cells. Once activated, they allow a tremendous influx of calcium into the cell — about 1 million calcium ions per second per VGCC.

When there’s excess calcium in the cell, it increases levels of both nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide. While NO has many beneficial health effects, massively excessive amounts of it react with superoxide, forming peroxynitrite, which is an extremely potent oxidant stressor.

Peroxynitrites, in turn, break down to form reactive free radicals, both reactive nitrogen species and reactive oxygen species, including hydroxyl radicals, carbonate radicals and NO2 radicals — all three of which do damage. Peroxynitrites also do their own damage. All this to say EMFs are not having a thermal influence; they are not “cooking” your cells as some suggest. Rather, EMF radiation activates the VGCCs in the outer cell membrane, triggering a chain reaction of devastating events that, ultimately:

  • Decimates your mitochondrial function, cell membranes and cellular proteins
  • Causes severe cellular damage
  • Results in DNA breaks
  • Dramatically accelerates your aging process
  • Puts you at higher risk for chronic disease

Peroxynitrites, Cellphones and Spikes in Chronic Disease

Once formed, peroxynitrite reacts relatively slowly with biological molecules, making it a selective oxidant. Inside your body, peroxynitrites modify tyrosine molecules in proteins to create a new substance, nitrotyrosine and nitration of a structural protein.7 These changes from nitration are visible in human biopsy of ALS, atherosclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, myocardial ischemia and septic lung disease.8

Significant oxidative stress from peroxynitrites may also result in single-strand breaks of DNA.9 This pathway of oxidative destruction triggered by low−frequency radiation emitted from mobile devices may partially explain the unprecedented growth rate of chronic disease since 1990.10 This, truly, is a far greater concern than brain tumors, when it comes to the hazards of cellphones.

Once you understand cellphones can contribute to these chronic diseases — not just brain tumors — you may be more motivated to limit your exposure. Although the top health threats continue to be cardiovascular disease, cancer and infections, the rates of increase noted for the following diseases and disorders is astounding. Some of them were not even public knowledge prior to 1980.11

Disease or disorderIncrease since 1990
ADHD819 percent
Alzheimer’s disease299 percent
Autism2,094 percent
Bipolar disease in youth10,833 percent
Celiac disease1111 percent
Chronic fatigue syndrome11,027 percent
Depression280 percent
Diabetes305 percent
Fibromyalgia7,727 percent
Hypothyroidism702 percent
Lupus787 percent
Osteoarthritis449 percent
Sleep apnea430 percent

Why You Cannot Depend on Industry Claims

Many are unaware that the telecommunications industry is perhaps more well-funded than the pharmaceutical industry, and just as powerful politically. Their lobbyists are very effective in disseminating and protecting the industry’s version of the truth. Needless to say, the industry will also actively discredit research that demonstrates harm and/or defund research projects that start to reveal problems.

In fact, the current head of the Federal Communications Commission was formerly the chief lobbyist for the telecommunications industry — one of the worst cases of the disgusting revolving door between industry and government and the fox guarding the hen house that I have seen in some time.

“I know how they’ve attacked various people,” Pall says. “In the U.S. … the funding for the EMF research [by the Environmental Protection Agency] was cut off starting in 1986 … The U.S. Office of Naval Research had been funding a fair amount of research in this area [in the ’70s]. They [also] … stopped funding new grants in 1986 …  And then the National Institutes of Health (NIH) a few years later followed the same path …

[I]t’s actually shocking to say there are only two countries in the world that are doing a lot of research in this, well beyond their normal scope … Turkey and Iran … they’re doing quite a bit of good research in both of those countries on EMFs … What I’ve been doing is I’ve been doing it on my own. I’ve been contributing my time to it and my efforts and, at least to a small extent, some money to it. But it doesn’t cost that much, so I can do it.

So, we have the fact that the money was cut off. One strongly suspects the industry had a role on that. The industry, with the 1996 Telecommunications Act, gave the regulation to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has done nothing in terms of protecting the public.

In addition, they prevented the public from protecting their health with regard to their exposures from the cellphone towers. We cannot sue to prevent cellphone towers from being put near our workplace or homes. Basically, what the Congress did was to say our health makes no difference … So, we’re in extremely deep trouble,” Pall says.

The CDC backpedaled on  their initial warning regarding EMF health risks and now offer no warning in spite of the overwhelming evidence that EMF’s cause many health issues.

Are You Affected by One of These EMF-Related Health Problems?

Your body is a complex communication device where cells, tissues, and organs “talk” to each other to perform basic functions. At each of these levels, the communication includes finely tuned bio-electrical transmitters and receivers, which are tuned like tuning into a radio station.

What happens when you expose a radio antenna to a significant amount of external noise? You get static from the noise — and that is what is happening to your body in today’s “electrosmog” environment. It’s not only cell phones that pose a problem; all form of dirty electricity have the potential to harm human health.

Magda Havas, PhD, associate professor of Environmental and Resource Studies at Trent University explained:11

‘Dirty Electricity’ can … be used to describe electric power that has become corrupted by our use of modern appliances.

Items such as CFL bulbs, cell phone transmission antennas, power supplies for portable computers, cell phone chargers, dimmer switches, variable speed fans and many other electronic devices that require a transformer to convert the voltage will ‘dirty’ the electricity that enters your home.

This form of dirty electro-magnetic fields (EMF) is invisible to the eye, but has a biological effect on the human body and has been associated with a wide variety of illnesses.”

In “Dirty Electricity: Electrification and the Diseases of Civilization,” epidemiologist Sam Milham, MD also points out that the major diseases plaguing modern man — heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc. — may also be triggered by dirty electricity.

Dr. Milham showed that populations without electrification experienced less disease than those in urban areas with electrification, and that rural death rates correlated with levels of electrical service for most causes examined.12 Conditions linked to electrification included cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and suicide. Camilla Rees of said:

“Dr. Milham’s work suggests society may have overlooked one of the most important underlying root causes of illness. The health sector’s focus on lifestyle, chemical pollutants, genetics and the like, may have missed the role of every day electromagnetic fields from electrification.

It is now clear we must assess all sources of electromagnetic radiation in our midst, not just wireless communication technologies, but also electric and magnetic fields, and high frequency transients on electrical wiring, known as ‘dirty electricity.’

In the video above you can listen to my powerful interview with Dr. Devra Davis, who is one of the most well-respected and credentialed researchers on the dangers of cellphones, among a number of other things.

” … [A] cellphone is a two-way microwave radio,’ Dr. Davis pointed out. “Industry has fought successfully to use the phrase ‘radiofrequency energy’ instead of microwave radiation. Because they know radiofrequency energy sounds fine.

We listen to music with radios. Everybody needs more energy. What could be better than that?

But radiofrequency energy is another word for microwave radiation. If people understood that they were holding a two-way microwave-radiating device next to their brain or next to their reproductive organs, they might think differently about it.”

Since biological damage from EMFs is triggered by activation of your VGCCs, it stands to reason that tissues with the highest densities of VGCCs are at greater risk of harm. Your body tissues with the highest concentration of VGCCs (and most susceptible to damage from EMFs) include your:

  • Brain
  • Testes (for men)
  • Nervous system
  • Pacemaker of your heart resulting in arrhythmias
  • Retina

When VGCCs are activated in your brain, they release neurotransmitters and neuroendocrine hormones. Elevated VGCC activity in certain parts of your brain has been shown to produce a variety of neuropsychiatric effects. Among the most common consequences of chronic EMF exposure to your brain are:12

  • Alzheimer’s
  • Anxiety
  • Autism: One of my longtime mentors, Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, has linked autism in children to excessive EMF exposure during pregnancy
  • Depression

While EMFs may not be the sole cause of heart problems, it is very likely a significant factor and one worthy of further investigation, especially if you are taking a heart medication. The most common heart issues that have been tied to EMF exposure include:

  • Atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter
  • Bradycardia (slow heartbeat)
  • Cardiac arrhythmias (associated with sudden cardiac death)
  • Heart palpitations
  • Tachycardia (fast heartbeat)

Continued on next page…


The 5th generation of wireless technology. Basically, 5G will make everything you do online a whole lot faster. However, 5G cellular technology is dangerous because it emits Radio Frequency (RF) Radiation and it does so at ultra high frequencies and with ultra high intensity, compared to earlier technologies. The WHO classified RF Radiation as a possible “carcinogenic” in 2011. And there are literally hundreds of peer reviewed scientific studies linking RF Radiation to things like cancer, crib death, DNA damage (especially in infants and fetuses) and male infertility. Also because of the limits of the frequencies used, in order for users to have good reception it is estimated they will need to put a mini cell station every 2 to 8 houses. This will multiply significantly the amount of RF Radiation we will be exposed to.

We’re talking nanoseconds to open a file, cruise the internet and watch movies and shows on Netflix.   5G operates in shorter signals, and because of that some tech experts estimate there will need to be base station for every 2 to 8 homes in an urban area. We’re talking thousands, if not millions of additional base stations across the country just to make 5G available for everyone.  Implementing the 5G infrastructure will be an incredible feat.

According to PC Magazine, each generation of wireless technology has been defined by its capabilities, such as speed, responsiveness, and how many devices can be connected to the network at any one given time.  5G is expected to be the “Rolls Royce” of wireless connections, if you will. We’re talking nanoseconds to open a file, cruise the internet and watch movies and shows on Netflix.

5G is supposed to be 100 times faster than 4G while lowering the typical 4G “ping” factor from between 10ms and 50ms (milliseconds) to 1ms, however tests performed on the world’s first 5G phone in Chicago, were nowhere near as fast as promised.

In spite of the cutthroat American race between wireless providers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, China has declared that it intends to emerge as the global leader on 5G rollout to its own 1.4 billion citizens. China is also mass-producing the technology to sell to the rest of the world.

In the U.S., 5G is being heavily promoted by the Trump Administration. The Federal Communications Commission issued a ruling in September 2018 that blocks cities from charging higher fees for installing 5G infrastructure. Loud protests have been registered from the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Counties, the National Governors Association and the Nation Conference of State Legislatures. Why? Because the FCC’s actions are unconstitutional and cities are being stripped of the little sovereignty they have left. Thus far, the FCC is undeterred in its position.

More And More Cell Towers

This 5th Generation of cell phone technology is being rolled out as I am writing this article. Most people are familiar with the earlier cellular generations called 1G, 2G, 3G and most recently 4G. And if you think back over the years you will realize that as time has moved on, and as we have moved through the first four cellular generations, we have gotten more and more cell towers installed. Why is this?

If you ask the average guy on the street “why do they always seem to be putting in more and more cell towers?” Most people would say “they are just trying to improve our cell phone reception”. While this is technically true, what most people do not realize is that as we advanced from cellular generation to generation, the radio frequencies being used have increased.

The higher the radio frequency, the shorter the wavelength is, and the shorter distance they can travel. So we have needed more and more cell towers because our cell signals travel shorter and shorter distances. Yes, especially early on, we needed more and more cell towers for the different carriers to be able to provide coverage around the country. But as the generations advanced, and our signal distance capabilities shortened, we needed even more cell towers than we would have needed with earlier generations.

Frequency Increases Data Capacity

The reason that each generation needed to use higher and higher frequencies, is because the amount of data that needed to be carried by each generation increased significantly. 1G was mostly using the lower analog frequencies. These radio waves traveled very long distances and could go through buildings and trees. Since all we used was voice transmission this was sufficient.

But higher frequencies can carry more data. So with 2G and 3G where we got the ability to text and access the internet we needed higher frequencies to carry the huge increase in data. The same is true with 4G as we got full access to internet video streaming capabilities. Again we needed higher frequencies to be able to carry the huge increase in data.

Why 5G Needs A Lot More Cell Towers

5G is taking the need for more cell towers to a whole new level. With the roll out of 5G technology companies are trying to create the “internet of things”, connecting everything with computer functionality to the internet. From self driving cars to your baby monitor, and everything in between, will all be connected and sharing data. Even hologram telephone conversations are in the workings as this technology rolls out.

In order to carry this enormous and unbelievable increase in data the plan is to use dramatically higher frequency radiation. The 1G through 4G technologies used less than 6 GHz frequencies. 5G plans on at least using 24 GHz to 90 GHz, and possibly up to 300 GHz frequency RF Radiation.

In these frequencies the wave lengths are millimeters long and highly dense. What this means to you and me is if it starts raining, or if you walk behind a tree, you would lose your cell signal. To over come this technology companies are planning to increase the number of cell towers dramatically as well as implement a more sophisticated directional beaming technology. 5G needs this in order to pass your signal from cell tower to cell tower and even bounce it off of obstacles to reach you. It is estimated that they will need mini cell towers every 2 to 8 houses in order to maintain good signal connections.

5G Mini Cell Towers

Mini 5G Cell Station

We have all seen the large cell towers along freeways and in different parts of our cities. We will still have those. However the “mini cell towers” or “mini cell stations” will not be nearly so noticeable. The image at the top of this article as well as the image to the right of this paragraph, are both pictures of current mini cell towers attached to street light poles in California.

These will be on street light poles like this, or situated on the tops or sides of buildings. Even things like church steeples will sometimes have them. They will be everywhere because if you walk behind a tree or if it rains there has to be another cell tower close enough by for the cellular algorithm to quickly transfer your signal to before you lose it.

The system will be constantly moving us from cell tower to cell tower without us even realizing it so that we keep our continuity and don’t lose our signal. Can you imagine what would happen if a self driving car lost its signal even for just a few seconds? That is why there will be so blasted many of these mini cell stations.

When Will 5G Be Fully Rolled Out?

It will be here sooner than you think.  Cell phone companies and other tech giants are working around the clock, literally, to make 5G a reality by 2019 or 2020.  That’s about a year from now.  According to, here’s a full list of companies working together to develop and create the infrastructure to bring 5G online: “AT&T, NTT Docomo, SK Telecom, Vodafone, Ericsson, Qualcomm, British Telecom, Telstra, Korea Telecom, Intel, LG Uplus, KDDI, LG Electronics, Telia Company, Swisscom, TIM, Etisalat Group, Huawei, Sprint, Vivo, ZTE and Deutsche Telekom.”

Apparently, Verizon is working on its own to create a network in a few select cities around the country.  So, what will 5G mean for you? Well, from a technical perspective you’ll be able to do everything you do now on your phone, except a lot faster.  For perspective, let’s say 4G is a high-end Chevy Camaro and the 5G is a lamborghini.  Imagine the two on a race track? The checkered flag waves and the networks are off.  By the time 4G crosses the finish line, 5G has already passed it 100 times.  That’s how fast we’re talking.

At the writing of this article 5G mini cell towers are already being installed all over certain cities in California and other cities around the country (and world for that matter). But it will be at least 5 to 10 years for it to be implemented everywhere as planned. The infrastructure costs are going to be huge by even the most conservative of estimates, but the biggest financial powerhouses are funding this.

The first 5G WiFi routers are already being sold and the first 5G cell phones are planned to be release sometime in 2019. By the way a 5 GHz WiFi router is not the same thing as a 5G WiFi Router. A 5G WiFi router will use the 60 GHz, 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz frequencies whereas a 5 GHz WiFi router will only use 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz frequencies.

5G As Military Weapons

What a lot of people do not realize is that governments and other global entities are behind the roll out of 5G for more reasons than just increasing data capacities for civilian communications. 5G has huge military uses and functions. Some of you may have heard or remember US President Donald J Trump creating the new U.S. “Space Force”. Well he is talking about 5G technology. Let me explain.

China developed a space technology using “Quantum Entanglement“. This technology uses satellites and enables military communication that surpasses anything we have ever had or used in human history. China had a satellite that launched in August of 2016 which has now validated across a record 1200 kilometers using the “spooky action” that Albert Einstein said he abhorred.

I am going to talk a bit complicated for a moment. In the test of China’s satellite entangled photons were sent to separate stations on earth. Measuring one photon’s quantum state instantly determines the other, no matter how far away it is. And then they pair. One Photon can be sent to a particular station on earth while the other photon, it’s pair, remains in the satellite. When a third photon is entangled with the one on earth this is communicated back to the satellite. This enables a new encrypted method of communication.

So basically what Quantum Entanglement is is a way for a military to communicate amongst themselves in a way that is extremely difficult for an enemy to crack. (It also gives that nation the ability to more easily decode enemy encrypted communications.) It is an encrypted form of communication that we did not even think was possible. Albert Einstein thought of it in theory. China is developing this attempting to set up a space based military communication system that will not be able to be cracked by its enemies.

So what has this to do with 5G? Well this is an advanced technology using electromagnetic radiation as a means of communication. My understanding is very limited with this but in reading about it is an advanced part of the 5G technology. So basically right now we have a technology race between the super powers of the world, and implementing 5G is a key part of winning this race.

And being the first nation to fully implement 5G will enable control of space (including cyber space) and create other military weapon opportunities that will give a huge advantage to the most advanced nation.

So government and other global powerhouses all have a vested interest in rolling out 5G as fast as humanly possible. What this means is that the civilian cellular technology companies are not left to funding the required infrastructure build-out on their own. They are getting massive government and other global financial funding sources to speed through the infrastructure build out.

5G Cellular Networks As Weapons

Okay as I get into this topic do not think that I just put my tin foil hat on. What I am going to discuss here is what these systems could be used for if controlled by the wrong hands. The potential is there and is a big enough risk that I believe it deserves a brief mention. Even if we completely trust our government, (which would be foolish), computer controlled systems are subject to hacking threats by foreign enemy forces. The capabilities of the 5G cellular network could be used as a weapon against the civilian population. It could be used by our own government if they ever get evil enough, or be taken over and used by a foreign power as a terrorist act or as an act of war.

One of the key functions required by the 5G network for cell phone users to be able to not lose their signal is the ability of the system to use antenna arrays to both locate cell phones and to point at towers and cell phones. Even now with the earlier technology generations this capability is required, but it will be more important and refined in a 5G network.

A Bluetooth headset and the typical microwave oven use the exact same RF Radiation frequency, 2.45 GHz. The difference between one cooking you and one not is the amperage of the signal, or its density. Cell towers around a town could do more damage to the inhabitants of the town if the density of the signal is increased. Theoretically they could either cook the town as a whole, or point the energy at a specific person and cook them.

Scientific Studies & Information

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.

In an article published on Sunday, February 10th, 2019 by Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley on he posts a bunch of scientific studies on the harmful effects of 5G radiation. I just wanted to quote one of the findings here. It said: “The results also show that the peak-to-average ratio of 1,000 tolerated by the International Council on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guidelines may lead to permanent tissue damage after even short exposures, highlighting the importance of revisiting existing exposure guidelines.” The guidelines mentioned here mean the current governmental RF Radiation safety guidelines which they are saying are insufficient. They are calling for new guidelines to be set up considering their new findings.

Following is a quote from a Daily Mail article about the roll-out of 5G: “According to Dr Joel Moskowitz, a public health professor at the University of California, Berkeley, MMWs could pose a very real danger. ‘The deployment of 5G, or fifth generation cellular technology, constitutes a massive experiment on the health of all species,’ he told Daily Mail Online. Because MMWs are weaker than microwaves, they are predominantly absorbed by the skin, meaning their distribution is quite focused there,

‘Since skin contains capillaries and nerve endings, MMW bio-effects may be transmitted through molecular mechanisms by the skin or through the nervous system,’ Dr Moskowitz writes on his blog. He also told Daily Mail Online that he’s concerned that ‘5G will use high-band frequencies, or millimeter waves, that may affect the eyes, the testes, the skin, the peripheral nervous system, and sweat glands.’ ‘Millimeter waves can also make some pathogens resistant to antibiotics,’ he added.”

Cindy L. Russell

This is a constant theme coming from many scientists around the globe that have participated in studies on RF Radiation. Another example is this study finding here by Cindy L. Russell entitled “5G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications” posted on

In the abstract (I paraphrase) she talks about how the current human generation is the first generation to experience cradle to grave exposure to RF Radiation. She points out how difficult it is now to find a “controlled group” since it is hard to find anyone that has not been exposed. Since there are so many studies showing the harmful effects of RF Radiation, she advises a more “precautionary approach” to advancing new wireless technologies.

Letters From Doctors & Scientists

In an article entitled “Small Cells, Mini Cell Towers, Wireless Facilities And Health: Letters From Scientists On The Health Risk Of 5G”, the people at have a list of links to actual letters from scientists and doctor about 5G. In this article it says the following describing these links:

“Please see on this page a short list of letters from expert scientists, doctors and public health experts sent to government officials regarding the issue of streamlining small cells in neighborhoods. In these letters scientists share the research supporting their opinion that wireless exposure to the public should be minimized and the deployment of small cell antennas into neighborhoods should be halted.”

Just as an example of these letters, here is one written by 18 doctors and scientists dated September 19, 2017 to the then Governor of the State Of California, Edmund G. Brown Jr., they ask for his veto against a bill that was pending in the state legislature. In this letter they state “There is a substantial body of evidence that this technology is harmful to humans and the environment. The 5G millimeter wave is known to heat the eyes, skin and testes, and the ubiquitous placement of these towers will expose California’s population 24/7.

Of particular concern are the most vulnerable among us — the unborn, children, the infirm, the elderly and the disabled. It is also expected that populations of bees and birds will drastically decline.” Of course the Governor signed the bill into law. But this letter from these doctors and scientists is worth reading. They make some very good points.

The 5G Appeal

The 5G Appeal” is a 182 page document put together by a group of doctors and scientists calling on the United Nations and the World Health Organization for “protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure”. The summary of this document says “We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electro-magnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices.

These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).” Here is a link to the full document.

Dr. Leszczynski Sounds Warning

And finally in an article on entitled “Dr. Leszczynski Sounds Warning at Australian Meeting: Precaution with 5G”, Dr. Leszczynski’s warning to the Australian government is described. They even include a video of Dr. Leszczynski speaking. It is a very important article and is definitely worth reading.

On the “Scientific Studies” page of this website I also have links to each of these articles and links also to many articles and studies on RF Radiation in general. This is a resource page that is always growing. As I find more scientific studies and articles by these scientists I am continually adding them to this page.

Continued on next page…

Operation Watchtower

According to affidavits from Colonel Edward Cutolo, commander of the 10th Special Forces Group, and PFC William Tyree, it was one of many drug trafficking operations from Central America consisting of the placement and operation of low frequency radio beacons to guide low-flying pilots from Colombia to Panama. It also consisted of making available to the pilots the radio frequencies and schedules of drug interdic­tion aircraft so as to avoid detection. Because of the extremely low altitude these drug-laden aircraft flew, often less than 500′, they could not receive the line-of-sight navigational signals available throughout the world (VOR). Radio transmission from a drug-carrying aircraft on a particular frequency actuated a relay at the radio beacon that started up the gasoline-engine-powered generators and the radio transmitters used for navigation. The operation was led by George H.W. Bush, Bill Casey, and Donald Gregg.  Read More…


The first versions of the drugs were called “nitrogen mustards.” That’s because it was discovered during WWII when a ship carrying sulfur mustards, a nerve agent to be used in chemical warfare, was bombed and the troops on board were exposed to the chemical. Those men affected tested for depleted bone marrow and lymph systems, cells that naturally divide faster than other cells.  Scientists, at the time, wondered if mustard gas could be used in the treatment of cancer cells that also divide faster than normal cells in the human body. In 1942, Sloan-Kettering secretly began treating breast cancer with these nitrogen mustards. No one was cured. Chemotherapy trials were also conducted at Yale around 1943 where 160 patients were treated. Again, no one was cured. But, since chemo shrunk the tumors, researchers proclaimed the ‘therapy’ trials to be a “success.” Gradually, synthetic versions of the nitrogen mustards were developed, but they all had one common trait; they are unable to differentiate between “healthy” cells and “cancerous” cells. They kill everything. 

Read more